With Newly Conservative-Leaning Supreme Court, NCGOP Move To Redo Education Lawsuit

Source: WRAL

The conservative-leaning state Supreme Court has agreed to Republican legislative leaders’ request to revisit a landmark education lawsuit. 

Late last month, the state Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal filed by Sen. Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore, who argue that a trial judge lacked the jurisdiction to say the state owes schools $677.8 million, according to The News & Observer.

The lawsuit, Hoke County Board of Education v. State of North Carolina, underscores the constitutional right of school children in North Carolina to have the opportunity to receive a “sound basic education”. 

Last November, the state Supreme Court, which then had a Democratic majority, upheld an order for a multi-billion-dollar, multi-year plan that would address long-standing unmet needs plaguing schools across the state, and guarantee North Carolina students access to a sound, basic education as designated by the state’s constitution.

The plan, commonly known as “Leandro,” was developed by school funding experts and has been supported by Gov. Roy Cooper and the State Board of Education. 

For decades, state Republicans have failed to adhere to the court order, refusing to pass measures or a state budget that incorporates the necessary investments towards educators, school support staff, resources and school infrastructure. 

Instead, state Republicans have used the conservative-leaning Supreme Court to roll back steps toward adequate public school funding as recommended by Leandro.

“Beyond question, public education is an important issue that sparks strong beliefs,” Justice Anita Earls wrote in her dissent. “And when this Court rapidly reverses course on that topic, it ‘calls into question its commitment to legal principle.’ It signals to North Carolinians ‘that their constitutional protections h[a]ng by a thread” — that ‘a new majority’ can ‘by dint of numbers alone expunge their rights.’”

Read more from WRAL

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.