Over 200 former justices, judges, and legal experts call on Jefferson Griffin to end his attempt to overturn NC election results

More than 200 North Carolina jurists, senior state government officials, legal experts, and practicing attorneys issued a letter to Judge Jefferson Griffin, urging him to drop his efforts to throw out 66,000 ballots cast in the 2024 November elections

The letter, sent last week, underscores the importance of respecting the will of the voters and highlights the threat Griffin’s efforts pose to the public’s faith in our judicial system.

The letter’s signatories include prominent justices and judges such as former NC Supreme Court Chief Justices Jim Exum and Henry Frye, former NC Supreme Court Associate Justices J. Phil Carlton and Willis Whichard, and former NC Court of Appeals Judges Gerald Arnold, Linda McGee, Wanda Bryant, Jack L. Cozort, Martha A. Geer, Reuben F. Young, Linda Stephens, and Ralph A. Walker. 

“We must ensure that the people of North Carolina can rely on the fairness and impartiality of our courts,” said Linda Stephens, former Judge on the NC Court of Appeals, in a press release. “Judge Griffin’s demand that the courts throw out the votes of more than 66,000 North Carolinians is a serious threat to the public’s faith in our judicial system.”

The letter comes as the case has made its way to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. Last month, the Wake County Superior Court ruled in favor of protecting voters and denied Griffin’s attempt to throw out over 65,000 ballots, a decision he is now appealing. 

Despite multiple independent recounts confirming that North Carolinians elected Justice Allison Riggs, Griffin continues to find ways to overturn the election results. 

“Our state has reliable procedures in place to ensure that the vote count is accurate. Those procedures were faithfully followed and confirmed that Jefferson Griffin lost the election,” said Marshall Hurley, former General Counsel for the NC Republican Party, in a press release. “It’s time for Judge Griffin to concede and allow our state to move forward”.

Read the letter here.

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.