Taxpayer Dollars Fund Anti-Abortion Movement In North Carolina

Source: CNN

North Carolina is one of just eight states in the country that funnels federal money intended to help needy families to crisis pregnancy centers, according to CNN

What are crisis pregnancy centers?

Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs), which work to dissuade pregnant people from terminating their pregnancies, are notorious for lying to women about the safety and potential risks of abortion, according to multiple studies, abortion rights activists, and women who have been to the centers.

“The purpose of these centers is to try to stop someone from having an abortion,” said Dr. Amy Addante, an Illinois OB-GYN. “I cannot think of any other medical decision or any other aspect of health care where there is a group of individuals whose only intent is to stop you from receiving that health care.”  

Ashley Underwood, the director of Equity Forward, an abortion rights advocacy group, agrees and takes issue with the funding of CPCs. “Public dollars should go to promoting public health,” she said.

Studies show crisis pregnancy centers routinely mislead patients

A 2012 academic study of crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina found that 86% of centers promoted false or misleading medical information on their websites. 

A more recent study conducted by The Alliance, an abortion rights advocacy group, found that such misinformation includes false claims that abortions increase the risk of cancer and infertility. 

The study, conducted in nine states, found that more than a third of CPCs offer “abortion pill reversal,” a medically dubious, unproven treatment that purports to undo a medication abortion but has been denounced by medical groups and found to be dangerous by researchers.

Funding for CPCs in North Carolina comes at least partly from the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program

TANF is a federal welfare program that is sent to states like North Carolina as a block grant, which gives state officials wide latitude in how to spend it.

But researchers with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a nonpartisan think tank, say the program was intended to provide cash assistance to families.

“When you look at successes in reducing poverty by strengthening the safety net, cash assistance is the most effective way to help families,” said Aditi Shrivastava, Deputy Director at CBPP. “We are seeing states spend less of their money directly on cash assistance, and we don’t think that is what the program should be doing.”

Crisis pregnancy centers outnumber and often operate near abortion clinics 

Crisis pregnancy centers drastically outnumber abortion clinics in the United States. In 2021, there were 790 abortion clinics and about 2,600 crisis pregnancy centers, according to a database compiled by Reproaction, an abortion-rights group.

Furthermore, it’s not rare for CPCs to operate near abortion clinics. More than 100 CPCs around the country are located within 200 meters of an abortion clinic or Planned Parenthood location, according to CNN. Several are just next door.

“The purpose of co-locating near a legitimate provider is to intercept someone seeking legitimate health care and divert them into walking through their doors instead,” said Tara Murtha, the co-author of a report about pregnancy centers and a spokesperson for the Women’s Law Project. “It’s basically an obstacle course and a systemic barrier to abortion care.”

Crisis pregnancy centers threaten to play an even bigger role in a post-Roe world

In wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, some states are piloting new efforts to fund crisis pregnancy centers. For example, Arkansas and Iowa approved state funding for CPCs for the first time this year.

Maria Gallo, a sexual and reproductive health epidemiologist at Ohio State University, said that state funding for crisis pregnancy centers shows how conservative lawmakers prioritize anti-abortion rhetoric over medical care for women.

“It’s dangerous in part because they are legitimizing (crisis pregnancy centers),” Gallo said. “They are legitimizing that as a source of medical care when they’re not licensed medical facilities.”

Read more from CNN

Share:

More Posts

Otro año pasa con la demanda Leandro sobre el financiamiento escolar estancada

La Corte Suprema de Carolina del Norte continúa sin emitir un fallo en la histórica demandaLeandro sobre el financiamiento de las escuelas públicas, dejando el caso en el limbo más de 660 días después de que se escucharan los alegatos orales. La demora es inusual y se produce pese a que el tribunal ya publicó sus decisiones finales del año sin incluir este caso clave, que podría definir el futuro de la educación pública en el estado.

Trump vuelve a vender cheques de $2,000 sin plan, sin aval legal y sin garantías

Donald Trump ha retomado la promesa de enviar cheques de reembolso de hasta $2,000 a los estadounidenses en 2026, asegurando que los fondos provendrían de los ingresos generados por los aranceles. Sin embargo, la propuesta carece de un plan concreto y enfrenta importantes obstáculos legales y políticos que ponen en duda su viabilidad.

My ACA premium is increasing 240%

My husband and I are small business owners, so we rely on the Affordable Care Act for health care coverage. We currently pay $400 per month for medical and dental care. But, because of Republicans’ refusal to fix the crisis they’ve created, our monthly medical health premium is expected to cost us 240% more in 2026. And my daughter, a Medicaid recipient, could lose coverage altogether.

Autoridades federales comparten datos de viajeros con ICE, incluso en vuelos nacionales

La Administración de Seguridad en el Transporte (Transportation Security Administration, TSA) está proporcionando a las autoridades migratorias de Estados Unidos listas con los nombres de personas que se espera viajen a través de aeropuertos del país, como parte del programa de deportaciones de la administración del presidente Donald Trump, según informó The New York Times.