One Parent’s Complaint Leads to Book Ban in New Hanover County

Source: NPR/WHQR-FM

Recently, the New Hanover County school board voted to temporarily remove the book “Stamped: Racism, Anti-Racism, And You” from their district’s classrooms following a complaint made by one parent.

The decision came after a five-hour public hearing where Superintendent Dr. Charles Foust and Assistant Superintendent Dawn Brinson argued against Katie Gates, the lone complainant and parent of a former Ashley High School AP Language and Composition student.

Gates claimed that the book had “no place” in the school system’s classrooms because it supposedly promotes anti-American sentiment and disrespect for the Bible. According to WHQR, prior to bringing her concerns to the NHC school board, Gates had already tried to convince two curriculum committees to remove the book, to no avail. 

Gates is an active member of her county’s local Republican party, and while she may be in step with some of the far-right, extreme members of her party, recent polling suggests that half of Republicans oppose book bans

One of the Republicans who does oppose book bans happens to also be on the New Hanover County school board; at the public hearing, Republican Board Member Stephanie Kraybill’s first question to Gates was, “I’m wondering why you believe you have the right to dictate what the whole county can read – and not just what your child can read?”

Kraybill was referencing the fact that following Gates’s first complaint to her daughter’s teacher, her daughter received an alternative assignment to complete instead. 

The teacher who assigned the book initially, Kelli Kidwell, said she felt powerless and that she was disappointed that one parent could have so much power over her classroom. 

Read more from WHQR

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.