Advocacy Groups Warn About ‘Citizens-Only’ Amendment On The Ballot

Source: WUNC

In a naked attempt to boost voter turnout among their base, state Republicans passed a measure this summer to add a constitutional amendment to this fall’s ballot. The proposed amendment would state that only U.S. citizens can vote in elections, despite state law already prohibiting noncitizens from voting.

In September, multiple advocacy groups came together to denounce the ballot measure and the harm it could cause. The groups included North Carolina Asian Americans Together, El Pueblo, Democracy North Carolina, Carolina Migrant Network, and Common Cause NC, among others.

The North Carolina constitution currently states that “every person born in the United States and every person who has been naturalized” can vote. The amendment would remove language about naturalized citizens.

The amendment “can open the door for future bills aimed at restricting or eliminating the right to vote of naturalized citizens,” said Mario Alfaro, policy manager at El Pueblo.

More than 400,000 naturalized citizens live in North Carolina. The amendment will generate fear and confusion that will deter new Americans from voting, said Chavi Khanna Koneru, co-founder and executive director of NC Asian Americans Together.

“This is an insidious change to the constitution that sets a dangerous precedent for setting up barriers for eligible North Carolinians to have a say in our future,” Koneru said.

The groups urged North Carolina voters to vote against the amendment. In-person early voting for this fall’s election starts Oct. 17.

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.