Bill Currently In NCGA Could Make Rooftop Solar More Affordable For North Carolinians – But One Senator Thinks It’s Socialism

Source: The News & Observer

A bill currently in the North Carolina General Assembly would increase the state’s cap on leases for rooftop solar panels, a move that could help more people and businesses take advantage of the lower cost of electricity without paying full price for the panels and installation, The News & Observer reported.

Senate Bill 678 would raise the cap on rooftop solar leasing from 1% of the average amount of solar installations over the last five years to 10%.

In places like California, rooftop solar leasing has become a popular choice for those who want to take advantage of the lower energy costs provided by solar but can’t afford to pay for a full system installation themselves. Instead, the people or business pays a monthly fee to the provider to use the system.

North Carolina’s solar leasing program was introduced in 2017 as part of House Bill 589, but it’s very limited. According to The News & Observer, industry officials said that’s in part because the cap has prevented many installers from setting up leasing programs in the state.

Energy advocates believe that putting the cap at 10% could be enough to bring installers who offer residential leasing programs to the state or see existing installers begin to offer leasing programs, they told The News & Observer.

“That changes the game. It really does create an opening for installers across the state to make the case to invest more in this space as an option for customers because it is something they can scale upon,” Matt Abele, the interim executive director of the N.C. Sustainable Energy Association, told The News & Observer.

The bill passed through House committees without issue, but it’s going to face a roadblock in the state Senate.

Unfortunately, this is North Carolina and Republicans run the legislature here, so there is going to be at least one Republican politician who decides it’s actually socialism to let people use renewable energy.

That Republican is none other than Cabarrus County’s Sen. Paul Newton. Newton is no stranger to saying dumb things – such as when he called slavery and abortion “cultural issue[s]” and compared the end of slavery to the GOP’s efforts to ban abortion. He is also a former Duke Energy state president.

Newton, who introduced the original legislation, told The News & Observer that he would oppose lifting the solar lease cap. His legislation also includes a provision that would change the state’s renewable energy portfolio standard into a “clean energy portfolio standard” and would add nuclear energy into the energy production sources that can be used to meet those standards – a move that would directly benefit Duke Energy, his former employer.

Newton said he doesn’t believe the cap on rooftop solar leases should be lifted because there’s room under the existing limit and that he’s “philosophically opposed to a program he called ‘a socialization of costs,'” according to The News & Observer.

“They’re not even close to filling the 1% that’s in the program today so they should at least park this until the 1% has been exceeded or is filled and then maybe we have a conversation,” Newton said. “But I don’t like the predicate, which is socializing the cost against other customers.

Aside from solar leasing programs not being any form of socialism or “socialization of costs,” Newton also ignores the fact that the 1% cap is precisely why solar companies aren’t offering these programs. The current cap has resulted in a cycle of under-utilization – and perhaps that’s the point.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.