Black, Brown Students See The Problem With Increased School Policing – Why Can’t NC Lawmakers Do The Same?

Demands to keep schools safe after the mass shooting at a Texas elementary school have triggered a call for police presence in schools, but students are demanding the exact opposite.

For some students, having police on campuses does the exact opposite of providing safety, especially for those whose communities have been directly affected by the killings of their loved ones. 

Last year, police killed Andrew Brown Jr. in Elizabeth City while trying to serve warrants. Just this year, in the presence of his kids and wife, the police killed Daniel Turcios, a man who was a victim of a car accident in Raleigh, and four months later police killed Reuel Rodriguez-Nunez, who had just experienced a mental health crisis. 

It is no surprise then that so many students feel uneased by having police officers in schools, but the unease is not only ignited by things students see or hear on TV. Since 2020, a group of students have been pushing for the removal of police officers from school campuses and advocating for more funding for school counselors. According to the Associated Press, Malika Mobley, a high school senior and President of the Wake County Black Student Coalition, witnessed on her way home from school police officers detaining some of her classmates, who were being pushed into a police vehicle. She mentioned that they were crying and begging the officers to stop. “They were crying, ‘Why are you doing this to me? I didn’t do anything,’” Mobley said. 

Police presence in school is not a solution in the students’ eyes. Too many tragedies are perpetuated by the police, which causes marginalized people to not feel safe around police. In Mobley’s own words, “we don’t see police presence as part of the solution.”

School Resource officers have the responsibility to build relationships and trust with young students, however, Black and Brown students are more likely to have a negative interaction with police officers, said Katherine Dunn, Director of the Opportunity to Learn program at the Advancement Project. According to the Advancement Project, since 2007 there have been 200 cases of police officers assaulting students.

A study of the law’s impact by Professor F. Chris Curran at the University of Florida found that when there is more police in schools, there are more arrests and more reported behavioral incidents. Professor Curran mentioned that there is a need for a deep conversation about the benefits, but also the unintended consequences, of having police in schools, and about the potential increase in student incarceration and racial disparities.

Having police in schools doesn’t always guarantee there will not be violence or guns in schools or that the officers will stop the perpetrator. A clear example is the newly found guns at a Charlotte-Mecklenburg campus last week. There were yet two more guns found this time, raising the number to 30 guns found this year, surpassing the 22 found last year. The implementation of body scanners at high school entrances and anonymous reporting system to denounce potential risks was not enough to bring down the amount of guns brought to school, and actually coincided with the return to in-person classes and with the surge in teen-related gun violence. 

The National Association of School Resource Officers highlighted the importance of having “a carefully selected, specifically trained SRO on its campus whenever school is in session,” but at the same time rejected criticism that having armed police on school campuses repeatedly results in Black and brown students being disproportionately arrested and punished, leading to the school-to-prison pipeline. 

Like most of the country after the incidents in Texas, North Carolina is also increasing the amount of officers in schools, something that the campaign led by The Wake County Black Student Coalition wants to change. This goal didn’t come out of nowhere, but in fact started with stories they heard from students. 

Chalina Morgan-Lopez, a high school senior and co-President of the student group mentioned an incident from 2017 where an SRO officer was filmed lifting up a young Black girl and slamming her to the ground. Morgan-Lopez told the Associated Press, “I think it’s a reasonable response to want more officers in schools, especially from people who genuinely do feel protected by law enforcement, even though that’s not my lived experience,” Morgan-Lopez said. “But I think people need to take into account… that officers do in fact do more harm than they do good.”

At the end of the day, although the gun problem can be seen from different angles, the lives of Brown and Black students are always at the forefront of the issue. They are the victims of both the perpetrators of gun violence at schools, and of the failed but continued policing solution that creates unintended consequences, such as increased racial disparities and teen incarceration. Young people are no longer quiet and they are seeing the problem clearly – imposed force is not the solution, but the problem. 

Let’s hope gun-loving state lawmakers will soon come to that realization as well.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.