Conservative State Supreme Court Blocks School Funding In Leandro Case

Source: Editorial Staff

Earlier this month, the conservative majority state Supreme Court voted 5-2 to reinstate a lower court’s order blocking Superior Court David Lee’s ruling in November, which ordered the state to fund a school equity plan. 

“Disappointed is an understatement to hear about this decision by 5 on the State Supreme Court to willfully ignore the NC Constitution for our students have their right to funded public schools,” NC Association of Educators President Tamika Walker Kelly tweeted following the ruling. “Prime example of why elections matter.”

In November, the then-Democratic-controlled Supreme Court had voted 4-3 for Lee’s order, which would have increased funding in adherence to the Leandro plan. 

However, Republicans won two seats in the midterm elections, gaining a 5-2 majority on the high court, and giving the GOP the opportunity to roll back steps toward adequate public school funding as recommended by the Leandro plan

The two remaining Democratic judges on the high court dissented following the recent ruling. 

“Today’s order abandons the concepts of respect for precedent, law of the case, stare decisis, and the rule of law all in the name of preventing the State from complying with its constitutional duty to provide a sound basic education to the children of this state,” wrote Judge Anita Earls in the dissent.

The Leandro Comprehensive Remedial Plan was developed by school funding experts and has been supported by Gov. Roy Cooper and the State Board of Education. 

The plan was crafted as a blueprint to address the state’s neglect to guarantee North Carolina students access to a sound, basic education as designated by the state’s constitution. 

Despite the conservative-leaning high court’s latest decision, Cooper hinted at including fully funding the remedial plan within his budget during last month’s State of the State address

For years, Cooper has advocated for the full implementation of the school funding plan which would make investments toward educators, additional support staff, much-needed school resources, improvements towards child care access, and much more.

Share:

More Posts

La Guerra Contra DACA: Que le va pasar al programa que protege a los Dreamers?

La administración de Trump aconsejó a los beneficiarios de la Acción Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA) que se auto-deporten y advirtió que no están automáticamente protegidos contra la deportación. Trump prometió llevar a cabo el mayor esfuerzo de deportación masiva en la historia de EE. UU. durante su campaña, y rápidamente tomó medidas para aumentar la aplicación de las leyes migratorias tras su regreso a la Casa Blanca. Sin embargo, ha enviado señales contradictorias sobre DACA.

La mayoría de los adultos en EE. UU. están estresados por el costo de las compras

Aproximadamente la mitad de los estadounidenses afirma que el costo de los comestibles es una fuente de estrés “importante” en sus vidas en este momento, mientras que el 33 % lo considera una fuente de estrés “menor”, según el sondeo del Centro de Investigación NORC‑AP (The Associated Press‑NORC Center for Public Affairs Research). Solo el 14 % declara que no es una fuente de estrés, lo que subraya la ansiedad generalizada que la mayoría de los estadounidenses continúa sintiendo por el costo de los productos de consumo diario.