Election Officials and Democracy Advocates Lambaste NC GOP’s Anti-Voter Legislation

Source: Editorial Board

A trifecta of bills in the North Carolina General Assembly is causing consternation among a bipartisan group of senior county election officials and nonpartisan advocacy groups like the League of Women Voters. 

Senate Bill 747, Senate Bill 749, and House Bill 772 have the potential to “confuse, alienate and disenfranchise voters” according to the League of Women Voters

Coming on the heels of the recent voter ID mandate, the proposed bills would: 

  • Put restrictions on same-day voter registration, making most of these voters cast a provisional ballot
  • Eliminate the three-day grace period for receiving absentee ballots and make it easier to challenge the validity of an absentee ballot
  • Restructure the State Board of Elections so that more power is ultimately given to the legislature
  • Loosen regulations for polling place observers, making it difficult for voters to distinguish between authorized election officials and partisan political workers

A group of 16 Republicans and 16 Democrats serving on county boards of elections sent a letter to lawmakers raising concerns that these proposals could cause significant disruptions to voting and threaten the very election integrity that the bills purport to address. 

“Some of the current proposals, if implemented, may have unintended consequences that can harm rather than protect the integrity of our elections,” the letter, signed by Republican John Shallcross, president of the Election Boards Association of North Carolina, said.

Despite these objections, Senate Republicans unanimously passed Senate Bills 747 and 749 without any Democratic support last month. Those bills, along with House Bill 772, are now awaiting approval in the House. 

Share:

More Posts

Suben los Gastos del Seguro de Salud en Carolina del Norte para 2026

Las principales aseguradoras que ofrecen planes ACA en el estado han solicitado incrementos de tarifas que van desde el 27% hasta el 36%. Amerihealth Caritas propone el aumento más alto (36%), seguida por UnitedHealthcare (32%), Blue Cross NC (29%) y Cigna (27%). Estas solicitudes están siendo revisadas por el comisionado estatal de seguros, aunque la decisión final recae en reguladores federales.

Trump enfrenta juicio por abuso de poder al desplegar tropas en Los Ángeles y tomar control en Washington D.C.

Un juez federal evaluará esta semana si Donald Trump abusó de su poder presidencial al desplegar tropas militares en ciudades estadounidenses para imponer control político y reforzar su agenda. El caso, presentado por el estado de California, se centra en el uso de la Guardia Nacional y Marines en Los Ángeles tras protestas contra redadas migratorias en junio. Sin embargo, la preocupación por el autoritarismo de Trump va más allá del estado: también ha asumido el control de la policía de Washington D.C. y desplegado la Guardia Nacional en la capital del país.