Every NC Republican In The House Voted Against Marriage Equality – Including US Senate Candidate Ted Budd

The U.S. House passed a bill Tuesday recognizing same-sex marriages at the federal level – but, unsurprisingly, all eight House Republicans from North Carolina voted against it.

The Respect for Marriage Act passed the House with a 267-157 vote. Every House Democrat, including the five from North Carolina, voted in favor of the bill, which repeals the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

DOMA prevented the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages as well as all the rights that go along with getting married. In addition to repealing DOMA, the Respect for Marriage Act also requires that states legally recognize same-sex and interracial marriages from other states.

The move to codify these rights comes in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and the concern that many have regarding other constitutional rights (same-sex marriage, freedom to have consensual sexual relations with a member of the same sex, access to contraceptives, etc.) that could be next on the high court’s chopping block.

While speaking on the House floor, Tennessee Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen put the onus on Republicans to prove they weren’t homophobic and they respected the constitutional right of same-sex couples to get married.

“[The bill] simply says each state will recognize other states’ marriages and not deny a person the right to marry based on race, gender, sexual orientation,” he said. “The only reason to be against it is because you really don’t want to go on record as being in favor of those rights.”

Despite Cohen’s simple message, only 47 Republicans stood with Democrats to make sure that the rights of same-sex couples don’t get thrown out.

Among the eight North Carolina representatives to vote against the bill was right-wing extremist U.S. Senate candidate Rep. Ted Budd.

Budd, a man who has never done the correct thing when it comes to LGBTQ+ rights, racial justice, gun control, respecting democracy, reproductive rights, or supporting middle and working-class North Carolinians, will once again find himself on the wrong side of history.

Democratic candidate Cheri Beasley, who is running against Budd, quickly hammered Budd for his vote and threw her support behind the bill on Twitter.

“Ted Budd just voted against protecting our constitutional freedoms. Again. This time, he voted against legislation to protect same-sex and interracial marriage,” she wrote. “With our rights at risk, we owe it to families to defend their right to marry the person they love. Love is love.”

The bill will now head to the U.S. Senate where it will need 60 votes to pass – and its prospects look surprisingly promising after a number of lawmakers told CNN that they expect some Republicans to support the bill.

Among the Republicans who are expected to support the bill is one very shocking name – North Carolina’s Thom Tillis.

Tillis told CNN’s Manu Raju on Wednesday that he “probably will” support the bill. Marriage equality and Thom Tillis have probably never been mentioned in a sentence together in a positive way before now. In 2012, while serving as North Carolina’s House Speaker, Tillis strongly supported a same-sex marriage amendment that banned same-sex marriage in the state constitution. The bill was passed by voters but overturned two years later.

All 50 Democrats in the Senate have signaled that they will support the bill, meaning they will need 10 Republican votes due to the filibuster rule.

In addition to Tillis, Republican senators Rob Portman of Ohio, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have also said they will likely vote for the bill. North Carolina’s other senator, Richard Burr, along with senators Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Dan Sullivan of Alaska and Todd Young of Indiana, would not commit to voting for the bill when questioned by CNN.

Senate Republican Whip John Thune of South Dakota said he expects bipartisan support.

“As you saw there was pretty good bipartisan support in the House [Tuesday] and I expect there’d probably be the same thing you’d see in the Senate,” he told CNN.

John Cornyn of Texas, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Marco Rubio of Florida – told CNN they will vote against the Respect for Marriage Act.

In fact, CNN reported that Rubio called the bill “a stupid waste of time” as he entered an elevator with Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin, the first gay person elected to the U.S. Senate.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York has not set a date for a vote on the Respect for Marriage Act.

Here is the vote breakdown for North Carolina’s representatives in the House:

Voted in favor: Democrats Alma Adams, G.K. Butterfield, Kathy Manning, David Price and Deborah Ross.

Voted against: Republicans Dan Bishop, Ted Budd, Madison Cawthorn, Virginia Foxx, Richard Hudson, Patrick McHenry, Greg Murphy and David Rouzer.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.