GOP Control Of State Supreme Court Puts School Funding In Jeopardy

Source: Editorial Board

November 4 brought forth good news for educators, parents, and students across North Carolina, as the state Supreme Court ruled the state must fulfill its constitutional obligation in ensuring every student will receive a comprehensive education.

The 4-3 ruling, with all four Democrats backing the order, in the long-running Leandro school funding case, calls for an increase in investments toward public schools by 2028.

“The state Supreme Court’s Leandro decision confirms to all North Carolinians that we, as a state, will do more — we will do better — and sets forth an evidence-based plan for how and how much North Carolina must invest in our kids, families, and communities today and in the years to come,” shared Mary Ann Wolf in an article on EdNC.

However, Nov. 8 marked a shift in the balance of power on the state Supreme court, as Republicans gained two seats

With Republicans gaining control of the state’s highest court, the future of public education could be in jeopardy. 

Historically, Republicans have vocalized their rejection of the much-needed investment towards public education, going so far as to advocate for the removal and threaten the impeachment of state judges.

Earlier this year, Republican Justice Paul Newby ordered the removal of the late Superior Court Judge David Lee, who oversaw the education funding case, and placed Republican colleague and fellow alumnus, Judge Michael Robinson in the seat. 

The removal alarmed many and called into question the integrity of the state court, as Newby assisted his Republican legislature counterparts in avoiding their constitutional responsibility to ensure a sound, basic education for North Carolina students. 

Despite the conservative shift on the bench, education advocates say the court should continue its previous order and allow the much-needed investments to be enforced.

“To go back and change a historic decision so quickly would really damage the legitimacy of the court,” stated Matt Ellinwood, director of the Education & Law Project at N.C. Justice Center, in an interview with The News & Observer. “People would not know how to follow the laws of the state if it can so easily change based on the makeup of the court.”

Share:

More Posts

Trump vuelve a vender cheques de $2,000 sin plan, sin aval legal y sin garantías

Donald Trump ha retomado la promesa de enviar cheques de reembolso de hasta $2,000 a los estadounidenses en 2026, asegurando que los fondos provendrían de los ingresos generados por los aranceles. Sin embargo, la propuesta carece de un plan concreto y enfrenta importantes obstáculos legales y políticos que ponen en duda su viabilidad.

My ACA premium is increasing 240%

My husband and I are small business owners, so we rely on the Affordable Care Act for health care coverage. We currently pay $400 per month for medical and dental care. But, because of Republicans’ refusal to fix the crisis they’ve created, our monthly medical health premium is expected to cost us 240% more in 2026. And my daughter, a Medicaid recipient, could lose coverage altogether.

Autoridades federales comparten datos de viajeros con ICE, incluso en vuelos nacionales

La Administración de Seguridad en el Transporte (Transportation Security Administration, TSA) está proporcionando a las autoridades migratorias de Estados Unidos listas con los nombres de personas que se espera viajen a través de aeropuertos del país, como parte del programa de deportaciones de la administración del presidente Donald Trump, según informó The New York Times.