GOP lawmakers sneak campaign finance changes into unrelated bill

Source: NC Newsline

In a stunning move in early June, Republicans in the North Carolina State Senate introduced a proposal to make significant changes to state campaign finance law. The proposal, appended to an unrelated and also controversial bill to ban non-medical masks in public, would change campaign finance law to allow more dark money donations.

State law currently bans corporations and labor unions from giving money directly to political candidates. But both groups can give unlimited funding to 527 organizations, a type of federal political fundraising committee.

Republican lawmakers want to now allow these corporate-funded 527s to be able to donate to state political parties here in North Carolina. Political parties can give unlimited amounts of money to their parties’ candidates, so the proposal basically allows corporations to use political parties as middlemen to give money directly to their favored candidate. The proposal additionally limits disclosure requirements and makes it harder for the State Board of Elections to review questionable contributions. 

According to veteran campaign finance watchdog Bob Hall, the proposed changes would provide wealthy individuals with new ways to give hundreds of thousands of dollars to support a North Carolina candidate without their name being identified with the donation.

In a letter to the State Board of Elections, the Democratic Governors Association said that the proposed changes “would effectively gut the state’s corporate contribution ban and undermine existing contribution limits by creating a significant loophole through which excessive and impermissible funds can influence North Carolina elections.”

Republicans, who control the State Senate by wide margins, passed the bill without debate or explanation on June 6. Senate Democrats walked out in protest and later held a press conference outside the legislature, denouncing the surprise changes. 

“Senate Democrats walked out today because this election bill literally allows convicted felons and millionaires to buy our coming elections,” Sen. Jay Chaudhuri said. “We walked out today because it is critical we shine a light on a dark-of-night rushed process that will undermine our democratic process.”

“It’s no coincidence that such a rule change will be passed just two days after ads about Mark Robinson’s extreme abortion position started running,” Chaudhuri continued

The bill went to the Republican-controlled state House early the next week where it also passed.

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.