House Education Committee Hears Bill to Censor Race Discussion in Classrooms

Source:  Editorial Staff, WRAL

The state House Education committee held a hearing on House Bill 187 this week, a bill that would ban K-12 schools from teaching about systemic racism.

The bill, sponsored by the House Education chairman, Rep. John Torbett (R-Gaston), was previously filed in 2021, when it was ultimately vetoed by Gov. Roy Cooper.

HB 187 is the latest move by Republicans this session to take control over what happens in the classroom. Earlier this year, Republicans introduced a bill that advocates say will ostracize LGBTQ students and health experts testified will “make our children less safe.” And last month, Republicans asked the North Carolina Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling on the Leandro case, which required greater investments in public education.

Since January 2021, 44 states have introduced legislation or taken steps to limit how teachers can discuss racism and sexism in the classroom according to Education Week

In the committee hearing Tuesday, Rep. Marcia Morey warned that the bill could have a “chilling effect” on teachers and students by creating “ambiguity of what can and cannot be taught and discussed.”

Morey said, “Much of our history is race-related. And teaching and learning about lynchings and slavery and the effects of Jim Crow laws will make students uncomfortable, but it’s a sound basic education, it’s a full discussion of facts, of racism, in American history.”

Notably, the state’s largest teacher’s organization, the North Carolina Association of Educators, opposes HB 187. In a statement, NCAE President Tamika Walker Kelly said the bill is an attempt to limit the “honest and sometimes uncomfortable teaching of history.”

“Instead of focusing on supporting public schools with resources and making plans to alleviate the educator shortage, lawmakers have brought back this bill,” Kelly said.

The bill will now advance to the House Rules Committee.

Share:

More Posts

Trump administration’s move to shut down USAID will have major economic impacts on North Carolina

The move will impact more than just the 10,000 workers the agency employs and the humanitarian work it does overseas. North Carolina is the fourth-largest recipient of USAID funding in the United States, with state-based organizations receiving nearly $1 billion a year. That funding helps bolster a robust global health sector that adds $31.9 billion every year to North Carolina’s economy and employs 120,000 people.

To have their voices heard, thousands gather throughout NC to protest Trump, Musk, and Tillis

Earlier this month, thousands of demonstrators gathered at the North Carolina State Capitol in Raleigh to protest President Donald Trump. The protest was part of a larger event “50 states 50 protest 1 day” (50501) to oppose the president’s actions taken in the first month of his second term including a slew of executive orders that have caused chaos and confusion for the people of this country and the federal agencies that support them.

El Pueblo Lanza una Guía de Emergencia en Español para Inmigrantes Latinos

El Pueblo, una organización de derechos de los inmigrantes latinos con sede en Carolina del Norte, lanzó una guía de emergencia en español titulada “Familias Seguras. Guía de Emergencia para Inmigrantes”. La guía tiene el objetivo de informar a las familias inmigrantes latinas sobre sus derechos y prepararlas para posibles interacciones con las autoridades migratorias y de la ley, citando las preocupaciones sobre el aumento de las operaciones del Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés) durante la administración de Trump.

NC Republicans Push to Strip Power from Democratic Leaders—Again

This time, the NC GOP is targeting Attorney General Jeff Jackson, who has recently defended the state from the White House’s federal funding freeze, Elon Musk’s national data breach, and Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship. 

Senate Bill 58, proposed earlier this month, would prohibit the attorney general from making any legal argument that would invalidate an executive order issued by Trump.