NC Democrats Propose Investments Towards Accessible, Affordable Transportation

Source: WRAL

North Carolina Democrats are proposing a new shift in how the state’s transportation department prioritizes its spending. Traditionally, the N.C. Department of Transportation spends approximately $5 billion a year on creating and maintaining car and truck transportation systems across the state. 

State Democrats have introduced bills in both chambers, titled the Transportation for the Future Act, that would shift the transportation department’s priority from car and truck transportation systems to projects that would improve local communities’ transportation.

“We would stop prioritizing endless expansion of highways at the expense of all other modes of transportation,” Sen. Graig Meyer of Orange County said at a press conference. “North Carolina currently dedicates 94% of our transportation funding to highways. And this act lifts the current artificial limitations that we have in place on rail, transit, bike and pedestrian facilities.”

This shift of priorities is nothing new, as last year, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization approved a 30-year plan that eliminated certain highway projects in favor of localized investments towards such as bike lanes, crosswalks, and sidewalks. 

According to the board, the decision to prioritize local transportation systems supported its goals of eliminating fatal crashes, reducing carbon emissions, and increasing access to affordable transportation. 

State Democrats are hoping to do the same on a statewide level, as highways and roads across the state only work best for rural and suburban areas but aren’t a good fit for urban areas that want alternatives, according to Leonardo Williams, a Durham City Council member who is in support of the bills. 

“We can no longer take a one-size-fits-all approach to transit and getting people around,” Williams added. “Urban areas are evolving, so our needs are evolving.”

Share:

More Posts

Trump administration’s move to shut down USAID will have major economic impacts on North Carolina

The move will impact more than just the 10,000 workers the agency employs and the humanitarian work it does overseas. North Carolina is the fourth-largest recipient of USAID funding in the United States, with state-based organizations receiving nearly $1 billion a year. That funding helps bolster a robust global health sector that adds $31.9 billion every year to North Carolina’s economy and employs 120,000 people.

To have their voices heard, thousands gather throughout NC to protest Trump, Musk, and Tillis

Earlier this month, thousands of demonstrators gathered at the North Carolina State Capitol in Raleigh to protest President Donald Trump. The protest was part of a larger event “50 states 50 protest 1 day” (50501) to oppose the president’s actions taken in the first month of his second term including a slew of executive orders that have caused chaos and confusion for the people of this country and the federal agencies that support them.

El Pueblo Lanza una Guía de Emergencia en Español para Inmigrantes Latinos

El Pueblo, una organización de derechos de los inmigrantes latinos con sede en Carolina del Norte, lanzó una guía de emergencia en español titulada “Familias Seguras. Guía de Emergencia para Inmigrantes”. La guía tiene el objetivo de informar a las familias inmigrantes latinas sobre sus derechos y prepararlas para posibles interacciones con las autoridades migratorias y de la ley, citando las preocupaciones sobre el aumento de las operaciones del Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés) durante la administración de Trump.

NC Republicans Push to Strip Power from Democratic Leaders—Again

This time, the NC GOP is targeting Attorney General Jeff Jackson, who has recently defended the state from the White House’s federal funding freeze, Elon Musk’s national data breach, and Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship. 

Senate Bill 58, proposed earlier this month, would prohibit the attorney general from making any legal argument that would invalidate an executive order issued by Trump.