NC Doctor Pushes Back Against Abortion Access Hurdles, State Republicans Want To Uphold Barriers

Source: NC Policy Watch

Since the overturn of Roe v Wade, Republicans across the U.S. have attempted to strip away reproductive healthcare access through numerous avenues, including access to abortion pills.

In North Carolina, the battle over abortion pill access is rooted in a lawsuit filed by a local OB/GYN who sued the state, the NC Medical Board and others due to the hurdles patients must navigate before they can take the pill.

In January, Dr. Amy Bryant, an obstetrician and gynecologist who practices in Orange County, filed the lawsuit, saying that the state’s current restrictions impose “significant cost and burdens” on Bryant and her patients.

According to N.C. Policy Watch, the state law says “only doctors can prescribe it, and as in surgical abortions people must wait 72 hours after receiving counseling before they can take the pill. Patients must take the pill in the presence of a doctor. Telehealth appointments are prohibited.”

“As a physician, my number one priority is the health and well-being of my patients,” Dr. Bryant said in a statement.

“We know from years of research and use that medication abortion is safe and effective – there’s no medical reason for politicians to interfere or restrict access to it, or for states to force doctors to comply with mandates not supported by medicine or science. These burdensome restrictions on medication abortion force physicians to deal with unnecessary restrictions on patient care and on the healthcare system”.

Despite North Carolina abortion providers seeing a huge increase in in-state and out-of-state patients seeking abortion care, state Republicans are pushing forth laws to restrict vital reproductive freedom. 

Senate leader Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore have expressed their desire to defend the current state laws in the lawsuit. This comes after Attorney General Josh Stein’s office announced that it ruled in favor of the objection raised by Dr. Bryant to state restrictions in the lawsuit. Stein, who is refusing to defend the state’s restrictions in court, argues that the restrictions are “preempted by federal regulations protecting access to the pills”, the Associated Press reported. 

State Republican leaders have always expressed support for the controversial “heartbeat bill” and a 13-week abortion ban.

“Pregnant people shouldn’t be singled out by out-of-touch lawmakers to be forced to comply with restrictions that we don’t place upon any other kind of necessary medical care,” Genevieve Scott, Senior Counsel for the Center for Reproductive Rights, told ABC11.

North Carolina remains the last safeguard for abortion access to millions of Americans across the southeast of the U.S.

Share:

More Posts

Suben los Gastos del Seguro de Salud en Carolina del Norte para 2026

Las principales aseguradoras que ofrecen planes ACA en el estado han solicitado incrementos de tarifas que van desde el 27% hasta el 36%. Amerihealth Caritas propone el aumento más alto (36%), seguida por UnitedHealthcare (32%), Blue Cross NC (29%) y Cigna (27%). Estas solicitudes están siendo revisadas por el comisionado estatal de seguros, aunque la decisión final recae en reguladores federales.

Trump enfrenta juicio por abuso de poder al desplegar tropas en Los Ángeles y tomar control en Washington D.C.

Un juez federal evaluará esta semana si Donald Trump abusó de su poder presidencial al desplegar tropas militares en ciudades estadounidenses para imponer control político y reforzar su agenda. El caso, presentado por el estado de California, se centra en el uso de la Guardia Nacional y Marines en Los Ángeles tras protestas contra redadas migratorias en junio. Sin embargo, la preocupación por el autoritarismo de Trump va más allá del estado: también ha asumido el control de la policía de Washington D.C. y desplegado la Guardia Nacional en la capital del país.