NCGA “Unlikely” To Extend Childcare Stabilization Funding Beyond December, Republican Legislator Says

Legislators are set to return next week for their final session before state child care stabilization funds expire at the end of December. Advocates are urging a one-time allocation of $100 million to prevent closures and increased costs for parents.  

Rep. Donny Lambeth, R-Forsyth, had anticipated additional child care funding by year’s end but now says no new appropriations are expected until the long legislative session in 2025. “It is unlikely the GA will deal with any new appropriations until the 2025 GA convenes next year,” Lambeth wrote in an email. He noted ongoing evaluations of alternatives to direct funding, including consultations with other states.  

Advocates stress the urgency of interim funding to support families and child care providers until a budget is crafted next year. “We know that folks can’t afford to wait until next June for there to be an answer to this crisis,” said Chanelle Croxton, director of state strategies for the National Domestic Workers Alliance.  

Without state action, many child care programs could face financial strain. A February survey indicated that 20% of the state’s child care facilities could close within a year once stabilization funding ends. The legislature allocated $67.5 million in June—replacing 75% of federal funds previously provided through federal dollars from the American Rescue Plan Act since 2021—but even before those funds were distributed, the state saw a net loss of 69 licensed programs between July and mid-September.  

Child care challenges have already impacted the labor market. A report by NC Child and the state Department of Commerce found that one in five employers cited child care as a hiring barrier. Additionally, 100,000 fewer working-age parents with young children were in the workforce in 2023 compared to 2019.  

Neil Harrington, NC Child’s research director, warned of escalating consequences if stabilization funds are not replaced. “You’ll see more parents not be able to access child care, which might impact their ability to work, and our reports from this year show that’s already a big problem,” he said.  

Providers like Lynquay Harrison, owner of Open Arms Child Care of NC, have relied on stabilization funds to sustain operations and assist families. Rising operational costs, combined with limited subsidies, have put programs like hers under pressure. “The mortgage went up because the property value went up. My taxes went up, water went up, electricity went up, food went up,” Harrison said. “With subsidized care, you only want me to charge a parent about $195 a week, really? I mean, that’s one week of groceries.”  

Families are feeling the strain as well. Johnetta Rembert, a single mother whose son attends Harrison’s program, is contemplating withdrawing her child due to affordability concerns. “I can’t afford it,” she said. “The parent fee is just high, especially when you’re a single mother trying to make things happen. It’s a lot.”  

Advocates like Croxton are amplifying stories like Rembert’s to underscore the personal impact of the funding crisis. “It feels really abstract to decision makers, but when you’re in a place where you have actually made those connections with someone who is taking care of your child, who is educating your child, and you found a really great environment, the thought of losing that, it matters a lot,” Croxton said. “… We always want to emphasize that this is some of the most important work that there is in our state. We can’t continue to (use) piecemeal solutions. This is an essential function of every community, and it should be treated as such, and it never has.”

Long-term solutions may emerge in the next legislative session. One pilot program, Tri-Share, splits child care costs between businesses, parents, and the state and has been implemented in three regions. Advocates are also calling for increased subsidy distribution, expanded teacher wage supplements, enhanced NC Pre-K and Smart Start programs, and free child care for early childhood educators’ children.  

“It’s just something that has rippling effects for everyone, because it is such a foundation for our community and for our economy,” Croxton said. “We know this to be true because we’ve seen it happen. We’re seeing it happen. And if they don’t do anything right now, we will continue to see those centers close at probably more escalated rates.”

Read more from EdNC

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.