Republicans on NC Supreme Court Invent Way to Grant Themselves New Power, Throw Out Precedent

Source: WRAL

North Carolina’s right-wing controlled Supreme Court has once again done something unprecedented and harmful to our democracy and all it took was three sentences, WRAL reported.

The Supreme Court’s new powers were invented by the five Republican justices when they handed down a ruling on a case about a fired Durham police officer.

According to WRAL, the case in question involved an officer who was fired after he brought an armed standoff to an end by promising the suspect he could smoke a marijuana blunt if he gave himself up peacefully. The suspect surrendered and the officer let him smoke marijuana while handcuffed outside the officer’s cruiser. The officer was subsequently fired and he eventually filed a lawsuit against the police department.

The case eventually made its way to the state Supreme Court where “the justices were at a loss for what to do. There were multiple legal issues and no clear consensus on how the court should rule,” WRAL reported.

Republican Justice Richard Dietz wrote that “The justices’ questions revealed several alternative ways to decide the case, none of which could be reconciled with the others.”

Unable to come to a decision, the five Republicans decided they would just decline to make a ruling at all. Instead, they submitted a three-sentence opinion letting the Court of Appeals ruling stand, but they “unpublished” the decision, according to WRAL’s report. In simple terms, it means the ruling can’t be cited as precedent in any future employment cases in North Carolina.

Democratic Justice Michael Morgan said his Republican colleagues took the easy way out by declining to rule on the case.

Morgan wrote that because the conservatives on the court felt “discomfort” with some of the issues raised by the case, their decision to unpublish the ruling allows “the majority to proverbially bury its head in the sand and to neglect this Court’s obligation to answer necessary constitutional questions through the interpretation of state law.”

Morgan and Justice Anita Earls, the only other Democrat on the Supreme Court, wrote that their biggest concern wasn’t that Republicans punted on the ruling, but instead was with the procedural move they used to unpublish the Court of Appeals opinion. Morgan said that it was an unprecedented power grab.

As reported by WRAL, the move Republicans on the court used “is incredibly rare, and usually reserved for niche circumstances – none of which were present in this case.”

Morgan and Earls are concerned that the Republican majority is trying to invent a way for the court to unpublish Court of Appeals opinions whenever they want to and under any circumstances, without having to explain why.

“The Court is making a hasty and unexamined, yet fundamental and radically destabilizing shift in the authority to determine legal precedent,” Earls wrote in her dissent against the decision. “It has far-reaching implications for the jurisprudence of this state.”

Click here to read more about this case from WRAL

Share:

More Posts

Cómo la Casa Blanca ignoró la orden de un juez para dar vuelta los vuelos de deportación

La administración Trump dijo que ignoró una orden judicial para dar vuelta dos aviones con supuestos miembros de pandillas venezolanas porque los vuelos estaban sobre aguas internacionales. La decisión de la administración de desafiar la orden de un juez federal es extremadamente rara y altamente controvertida. “La orden judicial fue desobedecida. El primero de muchos, como he estado advirtiendo, y el comienzo de una verdadera crisis constitucional”, escribió el abogado de seguridad nacional Mark S. Zaid, crítico de Trump, en X, añadiendo que Trump podría ser finalmente destituido. La Casa Blanca da la bienvenida a esa lucha. “Esto llegará a la Corte Suprema. Y vamos a ganar”, dijo un alto funcionario de la Casa Blanca a Axios.

House Democrats try to move North Carolina’s minimum wage closer to a living wage

Democrats in the North Carolina legislature are attempting to raise the state’s minimum wage which has not been increased in over 15 years. Representatives Allison Dahl (D-District 11), Aisha Dew (D-District 111), Bryan Cohn (D-District 32), and Marcia Morey (D-District 30) filed House Bill 353, titled the “Fair Minimum Wage Act”, would not just raise the minimum wage once but continue to raise it as time goes on. 

“Dooming a lot of us to early deaths”: North Carolinians Fear Republicans’ Proposed Medicaid Cuts

About 3 million North Carolina residents — one in four —  receive health coverage through Medicaid, a figure that includes the more than 640,000 people who received coverage through the state’s Medicaid expansion program starting in Dec. 2023. Under state law, North Carolina’s Medicaid expansion program would end should federal funding for the program drop below 90%, cutting off access to the 640,000 North Carolinians who’ve gotten coverage under the expansion.