UNC-Charlotte Professor Develops PFAS Removal System Thanks to NC Innovation Grant

Source: N.C. Health News

Dr. Jordan Poler, a professor at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte, embarked on a mission to develop environmentally friendly solutions to a pressing environmental challenge: PFAS contamination in drinking water. Driven to minimize his environmental impact, Poler focused his research on creating sustainable and non-toxic methods for removing these harmful chemicals.

His innovative approach utilizes a combination of zeolite, a natural mineral, and cellulose derived from plant waste, creating a powerful and eco-friendly filtration system. This “cocktail” effectively removes contaminants from drinking water, including PFAS, pharmaceuticals and heavy metals.

Recognizing the potential impact of his research, Poler founded naneXPure LLC, a startup dedicated to translating his lab discoveries into marketable solutions. Collaborating with Monroe-based Goulston Technologies, he aims to scale up production and make these innovative water filtration systems accessible to the public.

The focus on sustainability extends beyond the filtration process itself. The system utilizes a regenerative cartridge design, minimizing waste and reducing the environmental impact of discarded filters. This innovative approach provides clean drinking water and promotes a more sustainable future. Poler’s research, empowered by NC Innovation’s grant program, exemplifies the power of innovation to address critical environmental challenges while minimizing its footprint. His work offers hope for a future where access to clean and safe drinking water is a reality for all.

Share:

More Posts

Revisiting Griffin Challenge

I am not sure if this offends me more as a law school student or as a veteran. It was both morally and intellectually corrupt. Griffin never claimed fraud, and two recounts confirmed his loss. He simply wanted to throw out ballots…

North Carolina’s opening-day spectacle demands accountability

People who knowingly vote illegally should be prosecuted. But that does not require turning the opening day of early voting into a production calculated to intimidate voters and undermine confidence in their elections. The court records show how that spectacle came together.