UNC System President Receives Bonus Larger Than His Base Salary

The UNC Board of Governors has approved a whopping $475,200 bonus for UNC System president Peter Hans, according to News & Observer. Considering that Hans’ base salary is $424,350, the Board of Governors more than doubled the compensation Hans would receive from his base salary alone.

Prior to his role as the UNC system president, Hans was the North Carolina Community College system president for two years, and held other positions on the NC Board of Community Colleges as well as the UNC Board of Governors. 

Compared to past UNC system presidents, Hans’ base salary is relatively low; when he entered the position in 2020, Hans had asked the board for bonus incentives to be incorporated into his contract to make up for the gap. The contract extended potential performance bonuses for Hans up to $600,000. 

Hans’ first bonus in November 2021 was $300,000; last year, his bonus was $451,200. 

The UNC presidential assessment committee conducts annual performance checks for the system president and helped determine how high Hans’ bonus could be; the committee met June 6 to assess the president’s performance.

At a UNC Board of Governors meeting, student aid, mental health resources and diversity of thought were cited as reasons for Hans’ increased bonus. Board chair Randy Ramsey praised Hans for his leadership performance, saying it took “discipline, humility and a whole lot of patience and hard work.”

Ramsey also cited Hans’ ability to traverse the political landscape of North Carolina, saying that Hans had “successfully advocated” for legislative budget priorities this year – despite the fact that state lawmakers haven’t settled on a budget yet – and created a welcoming culture across UNC campuses. 

“We’ve taken action to promote open discourse and protect diversity among all students, faculty and staff,” Ramsey said in the meeting.

Diversity has been a hot topic on UNC campuses, particularly after the recent policy instituted by the Board of Governors that bars the university system from asking job applicants to discuss their beliefs on “matters of contemporary political debate or social action.” The policy has led to a prohibition on asking for diversity, equity and inclusion statements from applicants, and critics of the policy have expressed worry that the policy will lead to self-censorship in the hiring process.

Read more from News & Observer

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.