Attorney General Stein Files Brief In Support Of Protecting Emergency Abortion Care

SourcePress Release

North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein filed a friend-of-the-court brief along with a coalition of 24 other attorneys general at the end of March, imploring the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a ruling that requires Idaho hospitals to provide emergency abortion care. 

“If a woman’s life or health is at risk, it’s imperative that she get the emergency medical care she needs,” said Attorney General Josh Stein. “Abortion care is medical care, and hospitals must continue to provide it.”

Under the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), to which every U.S. hospital with an emergency department that participates in Medicare is subject, emergency rooms are required to provide all patients with the treatment they need to stabilize their condition, including abortion care. This puts it in conflict with Idaho’s new state law that bans abortions in nearly all cases, medical emergencies included. 

The Biden administration has sued to stop enforcement of the Idaho law, saying that state law cannot interfere with the federal EMTALA. In their brief, Stein and the other attorneys general support the argument that abortion care has always been protected under EMTALA. That is, Idaho residents and visitors should be able to get abortion care in emergencies regardless of the state’s abortion ban.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear the consolidated cases Idaho v. United States and Moyle v. United States for which the brief was filed on April 24, with a decision expected in June 2024. 

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.