Republican NC justice calls Jefferson Griffin’s attempts to throw out 60,000 ballots ‘inappropriate,’ warns it ‘invites incredible mischief’

Source: NBC News

In a 4-2 vote, the NC Supreme Court ruled to prevent the State Board of Elections from certifying a race for North Carolina’s highest court, where Democratic Justice Allison Riggs holds a lead over Republican Jefferson Griffin. 

A full machine and a partial hand recount confirmed Riggs’ victory, but Griffin refused to concede. Instead, he has filed hundreds of legal challenges across all of North Carolina’s 100 counties, claiming that nearly 60,000 people voted illegally. The Supreme Court’s decision will allow justices to hear a challenge from Griffin that seeks to throw out 60,000 ballots over two months after they were cast.

The lone Republican dissenter, Justice Richard Dietz, argued that intervention by the judiciary close to an election “becomes inappropriate because it can damage the integrity of the election process,” calling Griffin’s efforts “post-election litigation that seeks to remove the legal right to vote from people who lawfully voted.” 

Dietz also warned that the court order “invites incredible mischief” because it will “lead to doubts about the finality of vote counts following an election, encourage novel legal challenges that greatly delay certification of the results, and fuel an already troubling decline in public faith in our elections.” 

On a heavily conservative court, Dietz’s break from his peers is noteworthy. Dietz was appointed to the NC Court of Appeals by Republican Gov. Pat McCrory in 2014. In 2022, he won election to the Supreme Court as a Republican, maintaining a firm conservative framework in his opinions. As a nod to his conservative principles, he cited another conservative justice in his dissent, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, to support his argument that when “an election is close at hand, the rules of the road should be clear and settled.” 

The filing deadline for all briefs in the case is Jan. 24, presumably delaying certification of Riggs’ victory for at least a few more weeks.

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.