Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Senate Bill 55 would require schools in the state to prohibit the use of cell phones during class time. The sponsor of the bill cites the distractions phones cause in classrooms as a reason this bill needs to be put in place. Critics worry about the danger this bill poses for a student in an emergency, either by making it so a student can’t contact help in a dire situation or making it take additional time to ready a phone to call for help. 

Senate Bill 58, one of the more discussed bills, takes aims at the power of Democratic Attorney General Jeff Jackson. This year Jackson has entered the state of North Carolina in four lawsuits against Trump’s executive orders that he announced on his first day in office. 

Senator Julie Mayfield points out that the four lawsuits all fall within Jackson’s right as Attorney General. “I’m just puzzled about what it is that we don’t like about what our attorney general is doing to help protect the jobs and the economy, to defend — which is his job — defend attacks on the jobs and the economy in North Carolina,” Mayfield said. She then posed the question of what happens if Jackson ignores the General Assembly. 

The primary bill sponsor, Republican Sen. Timothy Moffitt, said that retaliation is possible. “I could contemplate that the action that this body could take would be to take Chapter 114, Section 2, and just completely zero it out, and that way, the Attorney General is a feckless, empty shell of a position that has no authority to do anything.”

Senate Bill 153 would require state law enforcement offices to enter into an agreement with ICE that states their cooperation with ICE and law enforcement to assist with the enforcement of Immigration policies. 

This bill echoes the emphasis we are seeing from Republicans at the federal level on the urgency of immigration policy reform. Senator Buck Newton, a Republican co-sponsor of the bill, called it “the next step that the state needs to take to help support President Trump’s efforts to curb illegal immigration.” 

While Republicans call the bill a necessity, Democrats and advocates ask them to consider the harm it will cause. Policy analyst for the ACLU, Samantha Salkin, argues that the bill would destroy the relationship between immigrants and law enforcement. 

Senator Sophia Chitlik from Durham brought up an objection to a section of the bill that would prohibit public benefits from being used on individuals who are not U.S. citizens, pointing out the negative impact it may have on children who come from households where one parent is a U.S. citizen and the other is not. 

Mario Alfaro, a policy director for El Pueblo NC, insists this bill will create distrust and harm the people who contribute much to the state. “Instead of protecting the state’s citizens, it will create distrust and increase insecurity for everyone,” Alfaro said. “More than 50% of farm workers are immigrants, and more than 35% of construction workers are immigrants. We urge legislators to support policies that protect immigrants and their contributions, not those that ignore or hide the fact that North Carolina’s economy needs immigrant workers”.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.

NC Reproductive Rights Advocates Sound The Alarm Over RFK Jr.

The newly confirmed Secretary of Health and Human Services has expressed support for reviewing the federal approval of mifepristone, a move that could ultimately restrict access to the drug used for abortion and miscarriage care.

Reproductive rights advocates in North Carolina are raising concerns over the possibility that the Trump administration could revoke access to this key medication. Although Trump downplayed the likelihood of national abortion restrictions during his campaign, he recently directed Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to “study the safety of mifepristone,” according to Kennedy’s Senate confirmation hearing in January.