Fentanyl is the ‘epidemic within the opioid epidemic’

NC Policy Watch recently reported on the “epidemic within the opioid epidemic,” fentanyl. A synthetic opioid created in the 1960s, fentanyl is primarily used in anesthesia and pain management, particularly after surgeries and cancer treatment. It’s wildly potent and can be 100 times stronger than morphine. 

Another one of fentanyl’s features is that its chemical structure is extremely adaptable; small changes can make it 100 times more potent. Potency and adaptability have led to fentanyl becoming popular in the illicit drug market however sometimes people don’t know they’re buying something laced with fentanyl.

According to NC Policy Watch, “In the first decade of the new century, medical examiner’s offices in the nation’s largest cities began reporting fentanyl’s presence in an overwhelming number of overdose deaths. Even those who had successfully managed drug habits for years were overdosing from drugs they didn’t realize were now far more potent.”

In North Carolina, while death certificates do have a code for “other synthetic narcotic overdose,” we do not have a specific code for fentanyl’s involvement in a drug overdose. Using the general code, as of May 2022, there have been 1,342 deaths. 

One way to reduce this number would be to make Naloxone, a drug used to treat overdoses in an emergency, more widely available. 

Read more from NC Policy Watch

Share:

More Posts

Cómo las redadas migratorias podrían afectar la fuerza laboral en Carolina del Norte

Las redadas migratorias en lugares de trabajo están generando temor e incertidumbre en sectores clave de Carolina del Norte que dependen de trabajadores migrantes, como la agricultura, la construcción, la hotelería y otros servicios. El estado se apoya fuertemente en esta mano de obra para actividades como la cosecha de batatas y árboles de Navidad, la cría de cerdos, y la operación de restaurantes y hoteles. Cualquier interrupción en ese flujo laboral podría tener un impacto económico significativo.

Redistricting trial ends, judges to consider arguments about racial gerrymandering

The plaintiffs argue that the maps were designed in a way that Black voters in counties such as Guilford, Forsyth, and Mecklenburg were drawn into districts where the vast majority of voters were white rural residents who do not share their political views, thus diluting the Black voters’ voice in elections. They are looking for the courts to rule that the maps are unconstitutional.