Former State Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr Thinks Plaintiffs Should Appeal “Fair Elections” Lawsuit Dismissal

Source: NC Newsline

Former state Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr announced this week his intention to appeal a three-judge panel’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that partisan gerrymandering results in unconstitutional elections. However, he plans to discuss the matter with the plaintiffs first.

Last week, the three-judge panel dismissed a lawsuit filed by 11 voters against Republican legislative leaders. The lawsuit argued that district lines drawn for partisan advantage violated the constitutional right to fair elections.

Last year, the legislature redrew the state Senate, state House, and congressional district maps, replacing maps that had been created after a Democratic Supreme Court majority ruled the original districts drawn by Republican legislators were unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.

Republicans gained control of the Supreme Court in the 2022 elections and swiftly reversed the previous Democratic rulings. In 2023, Republican justices stated that partisan gerrymandering issues are political and not within the courts’ purview.

The Supreme Court’s reversal enabled Republican legislators to redraw the districts without concern for state court oversight.

As a result, Republicans ensured their party’s candidates would dominate the state’s congressional delegation once again.

In 2022, seven Democrats and seven Republicans were elected under a congressional district plan devised by three special masters, including Orr. The current year’s congressional district map features 10 strong Republican districts, three strong Democratic districts, and one toss-up.

Republican legislators’ lawyers requested the three-judge panel to dismiss the latest suit, arguing that the Supreme Court had determined judges should not address partisan redistricting complaints.

Orr attempted to convince the panel of three Superior Court judges that he was presenting a new issue not addressed in the 2023 Supreme Court opinion. He argued that fair elections constitute an “unenumerated right,” not explicitly outlined in the constitution but foundational to other constitutional guarantees.

The three-judge panel, all Republicans, rejected this argument, stating the case involved the same underlying issues decided by the Supreme Court in 2023.

The lawsuit’s issues are “clearly political,” and there is “no judicially discoverable or manageable standard to decide them.”

This was the only redistricting case in state court. Federal lawsuits alleging racial gerrymandering in congressional and legislative districts are scheduled to be heard next year.

Read more from NC Newsline

Share:

More Posts

Las Amenazas de Tarifas de Trump y sus Consecuencias para América del Norte

Las amenazas de tarifas de Donald Trump contra Canadá y México pusieron en riesgo la economía de América del Norte. Trump ha adoptado una postura agresiva con los dos principales socios comerciales de Estados Unidos. La implementación de tarifas del 25% a todas las importaciones desde México y la mayoría de las importaciones de Canadá, junto con un impuesto menor del 10% a los productos energéticos canadienses, causó una tormenta política y económica.

“North Carolinians v Griffin”: Statewide Rallies Against Jefferson Griffin’s Power Grab

Hosted by Common Cause North Carolina, the rallies over the President’s Day holiday will give impacted voters a chance to raise their voices and condemn N.C. Appeals Court Judge Jefferson Griffin’s effort to throw out 65,500 ballots cast in the November election.

Rallies will take place in various locations including Raleigh, Hillsborough, Apex, Greensboro, Charlotte, Salisbury, Asheville, Boone, Rutherfordton, Franklin, Greenville, Elizabeth City, Nags Head, Warrenton, Fayetteville, New Bern, and more.

Trump’s federal freeze threatens disaster relief, school funding, state patrol in NC

The freeze would result in North Carolina losing billions of dollars in funding for disaster relief, public schools, and state agencies. Though the order was temporarily blocked by a federal judge, Rep. Deborah Ross explained that it has left state and federal officials confused on how to proceed. She remains hopeful that it will not be allowed to pass but expressed the importance of understanding what is at risk.