Local Advocate Says State Abortion Ban Leads to Chaos, Danger to North Carolinians

Source: Fayetteville Observer

Reporting by Axios found that North Carolina remained the South’s destination for abortions in the first six months of this year. Amid state Republicans debating on the severity of restrictions, the state witnessed an influx of out-of-state patients seeking reproductive health care access, according to an analysis from the Guttmacher Institute.

Since the overturn of Roe v. Wade, 22 states have banned or passed laws restricting abortions. For North Carolina, a 12-week abortion ban went into effect back in July, further limiting access to reproductive health care for millions in the southeast region of the U.S. 

According to a National Partnership for Women & Families analysis, state abortion bans harm more than 15 million Black and Brown women.

“Women of color face more structural barriers to care to begin with, and those inequities are exacerbated when these policies further diminish their power and bodily autonomy,” stated Dr. Wizdom Powell, chief social impact and diversity officer at Headspace Health. “You end up having a domino effect of negative impact on women’s overall health and well-being.”

The Dobbs decision weighs heavy for more than 1.3 million transgender adults and 1.2 million LGBTQ nonbinary adults in the U.S., who are impacted by harmful biases, including through difficulty accessing gender-affirming medical care.

“In an effort to prohibit abortions, legislative bodies around the country have created chaos and danger to the health of many other women as well,” wrote Roberta Waddle, former chair of the Cumberland County Democratic Party, in a recent editorial. “Women’s lives and health are being endangered by the restrictions on abortions”. 

Since its passage in July, the abortion ban has been challenged by a Duke doctor, Beverly Gray, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology, who successfully blocked one provision of the law and potentially two more.

“It was very frustrating that the voices of the medical community were not heard when this law was being written.” Gray wrote on her website. “I was hopeful that the veto would be upheld, and we could continue to practice evidence-based medicine in our state.” 

“Our goal is to reduce harm from the bill and bring clarity to contradictory areas of the bill,” Gray added. 

Similar to North Carolina, the fight over abortion access is taking place in courtrooms across the U.S., where advocates are challenging restrictions and are suing to block bans.

Currently, more than a dozen states have abortion care protections. 

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.