NC House Republicans give health care providers a license to discriminate

Source: WRAL

A bill backed by NC House Republicans would allow health care providers, institutions and insurers to refuse care to any patient on religious, moral or ethical grounds.

Imagine needing a medical service and your doctor refuses to help you or your insurance refuses to cover it because they object to something about you. That is the scenario that GOP lawmakers are attempting to legalize with House Bill 819 the so-called “Medical Ethics Defense Act,” which could include refusal of care to patients based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or even political opinions or marital status.

Liz Barber, a policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina stated during a hearing of the bill that “Anti-trans bills are a trend that we’re seeing, and I think that this is just one play out of that playbook. It’s giving medical professionals a license to discriminate against trans people, and really, anyone.” 

The dangers of allowing health care providers to refuse service based on personal beliefs cannot be overstated. It violates medical ethics, puts vulnerable populations at risk, and can lead to a lack of access to health care services.

Health care providers have an obligation to provide the highest quality of care possible to their patients, regardless of their personal beliefs. Upholding this principle is essential to ensuring the health and well-being of all patients, and to maintaining the integrity of the health care system as a whole.

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.