NCGOP’s Dangerous, Controversial Public Education Bill is Likely Dead – For Now

A controversial education bill that was even more extreme than the outrageous legislation that usually gets filed by North Carolina Republicans is likely dead – at least for now, WRAL reported.

Speaker Tim Moore said last week that Senate Bill 90, which originally dealt with procedures for searching students, was unlikely to be heard this session. Earlier this month, in the middle of the night, Republicans amended the bill and added 24 pages just hours before the House Education Committee was set to hear it, according to WRAL.

The new provisions were largely about so-called “parental rights” in the state’s K-12 education system. The House committee pulled the bill from the agenda just before the meeting after lawmakers, school administrators, and others said they were concerned and confused by it.

“I don’t know that the votes are there for it,” Moore told reporters after announcing that the bill was unlikely to be heard. “I don’t know that that bill is going to move this session. There needs to be a lot more discussion in our caucus. And we’ll have to see where the caucus comes down right now.”

Moore said he couldn’t remember what issues there were with the bill, but that “There was some pushback within the caucus about some provisions concerning librarians or books.”

Those “provisions concerning libraries or books” include language in the bill that would require public libraries to keep material deemed harmful to minors in an age-restricted area of the library, require public libraries to receive written prior consent from a minor’s parents in order to lend them a book, and would essentially eliminate book fairs due to the requirement that all books sold at the fair would be subject to “prior review” before being sold.

Those are just a few of the things SB 90 would do to books and our libraries.

The provision that resulted in the most backlash was one that would allow parents – or right-wing “parents’ rights” groups like Moms for Liberty – the power to essentially fire whichever superintendent they want to. All these parents would need to do is file enough complaints against the superintendent that say their child’s school has violated their fundamental right to raise children how they choose. If five of those complaints are found to be valid, the superintendent can be fired or have their pay cut.

Rep. John Torbett, R-Gaston, said that it’s appropriate to fire superintendents “if they’re not paying attention and not dealing with the people they need to deal with when they have bad actors.”

Along those same lines, the bill would also give parents the right to appeal to Superior Court if they believe their child’s school has violated their right to raise their children how they want.

The bill also addressed gender and sex-related topics. For example, licensed school personnel would be required to tell parents if their child is identifying as a gender different from the student’s biological sex, essentially “outing” these children to their parents. Schools would also be banned from teaching fourth and fifth graders about gender identity, sexual activity or sexuality in their sex education classes.

In addition, the bill proposes a new process for picking textbooks and library books, would repeal a current law that allows physicians to treat minors for mental health issues without telling their parents and would create a new group, the majority of which would be chosen by the General Assembly’s majority (Republicans, at least for now), to plan the curriculum for public schools throughout North Carolina.

Rep. Julie von Haefen, D-Wake, called the proposed bill “a license for book banning committees to run rampant” and for far-right groups to get school superintendents fired.

Even if this bill doesn’t get a hearing this session, Republicans are notorious for re-introducing their most controversial legislation during the next session so we should expect to see this bill again – and it might be even worse the next time.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.