Outer Banks Leaders Say ‘Our Hands Are Tied’ When It Comes To Addressing Erosion

Source: WRAL

Residents of Dare County are facing a crisis that could threaten their coastal communities. According to county leaders, they have run out of funding to protect their communities from beach erosion and state law is holding them back from finding potential solutions.

The Outer Banks are especially vulnerable to the effects of climate change due to their geography. The barrier islands are less than three feet above sea level and are surrounded by the Atlantic Ocean, putting them at risk from ever-increasing flooding and erosion.

“Our hands are tied because of the money,” Dare County Commissioner Danny Couch told WRAL News. “We don’t have a lot of options, we have an option at this point, and it’s beach nourishment.” According to North Carolina law, beach nourishment is the only way they can build up their oceanfront which is a process of collecting sand from elsewhere and depositing it on the eroded shoreline.

Beach nourishment is a costly process and Dare County doesn’t have the estimated $30 million needed to replenish the beach in Rodanthe, where last year two homes were swept into the ocean. To make matters worse, North Carolina state law effectively bans them from even studying alternative tools to build up oceanfront beaches, such as energy-attenuating devices that have been implemented in other countries.

County leaders are urging the state and federal governments to act quickly to provide funding and a legal path to study alternatives for their communities. Without it, they fear their beach communities may not survive the effects of climate change.

“It’s reaching a crisis point here,” Couch said. “I am a betting man, and I’m going to bet that the first six months are not going to be good of 2023 here on the Outer Banks.”

Read More at WRAL

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.