Republicans in NCGA Negotiating on Bill That Would Take Appointment Powers from Governor, Give Them to Legislators

Source: The Associated Press

North Carolina Republican legislative leaders are working on a plan to take away even more power from Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper – and future governors – after the House approved a bill in May that would change who has appointment power over key state commissions, The Associated Press reported.

Now, Senate and House Republicans will likely meet to negotiate the details of their power grab that would see the legislature take control of appointing the majority of seats on multiple panels that Cooper currently has control over.

According to the AP, the House proposal and a version passed by the Senate in April would let legislators and Council of State members make most of the picks instead of the governor.

Cooper and other Democrats have called the NCGOP’s proposal an unconstitutional power grab. They have cited court rulings on the separation of powers between the governor and the North Carolina General Assembly that go back 40 years.

If Republicans get their way, the legislature would have control of appointments to commissions such as those that approve road-building projects, environmental regulations, and setting electricity rates, among other commissions and panels.

Republicans hold a veto-proof majority in the legislature, but those pushing the legislation have acknowledged that they will likely end up facing off against Cooper in court because of the bill, according to the AP.

The Senate and House bills don’t match up on all changes and if the two chambers can’t come to an agreement then no bill will be sent to Cooper for his likely veto.

Earlier this year, a bipartisan group of former North Carolina governors joined together to speak out against the legislature’s plan to strip powers from the governor.

Former Govs. Jim Hunt (D), Jim Martin (R), Mike Easley (D), Bev Perdue (D) and Pat McCrory (R) sent a letter to Republican leadership expressing their concern.

“We fear that it would inflict real chaos and harm upon the people of our state,” they wrote. “The Governor is charged under the state Constitution with carrying out the laws you pass and it is much more difficult to do this effectively with boards that have less than a clear majority of appointees from the Governor.”

Click here to read more from The Associated Press about the details of the changes included in these bills

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.