State Board of Elections Approves Early Voting Sites, Hours Early To Ensure Expanded Access For North Carolina Voters

Source: NC Newsline

The North Carolina Republican Party and its two Republican members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) are up in arms after the board approved counties’ early voting plans three months earlier than usual, NC Newsline reported.

The plans were approved in a vote along party lines, with Republicans complaining that having every county’s early voting locations and hours set in stone in May instead of August is “rushed”

The Board was forced to make decisions early due to a possible overhaul by Republican legislators that Democrats and voting rights advocates have said could result in deadlocked decisions on early voting plans. If that were to happen, it would create situations where disagreements over early voting plans would result in counties only opening one early voting site. That site would have just one day of Saturday voting and no Sunday voting.

Gov. Roy Cooper sued over the law and it was struck down by a three-judge panel in March. Republican lawmakers have appealed the ruling.

The NCSBE’s move to approve early voting plans three months early could help keep expanded access for this fall’s election.

According to NC Newsline, board members were given memos and maps from a lawyer representing the NCGOP and the Republican National Committee shortly before they met to vote on the plans on June 4. The GOP claimed that the early voting plans disadvantaged some voters who would have to make a farther drive to reach a polling site, which is quite an ironic argument coming from the party that wants to cut early voting sites and hours.

Board members said they received 20 memos that asked for more time. Some local elections directors said that the early voting sites in their plans were locations used many times in the past. They also said that their counties lacked places that could be turned into polling places in certain areas.

“The letters were nicely written. They tell an incomplete story,” said Democratic state Board member Siobhan Millen of Raleigh. All the letters criticize locations, but have “very vague solutions,” she said. “To me, I’ll be honest, it looks like a Hail Mary pass to try to delay a decision…” 

In previous years, the NCSBE would do its own analysis of drive times for residents but they can’t anymore because they don’t have enough staff, Elections Director Karen Brinson Bell told the board, NC Newsline reported. The NC Department of Information Technology tried to help but they are “resource-strapped” and couldn’t get the information in time, Bell added.

State board lawyer Paul Cox said drive-time analyses have always been a struggle for the board.

“There is no single formula to determine adequate sites,” he said. Site selection involves many factors, including whether the local board has access to desired locations and whether they provide enough space, Cox said. 

At the meeting where the plans were approved, the board was needed to decide early voting plans for 11 counties where the local board could not come to a unanimous decision. 

The disagreement was often over Sunday voting hours, according to NC Newsline. The Republican Party is generally opposed to Sunday voting.

Black churches often organize “Souls to the Polls” for voters on Sundays after services end. Republicans claim that by getting rid of Sunday voting hours, poll workers will be able to take a much-needed break on a day of religious observance. Courts have repeatedly ruled that outlawing Sunday early voting is unconstitutional due to racial discrimination.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.