When It Comes To Investing In North Carolina Schools’, Will State Republicans Take Action?

Source: The News & Observer

The newest chapter in the state’s long-running education case started in late August and continues with several hurdles coming its way. 

A state Supreme Court order that mandated legislators to fully fund the Leandro remedial plan has historically been met with resistance from state Republican leaders.

For months, state Republicans have refused to adhere to Superior Court Judge David Lee’s court order to ensure students across the state have the opportunity to obtain a sound, basic education as guaranteed in the state constitution.

Despite support from educators, parents and activists to fully fund the Leandro plan, state Republicans have done little to take action.

Back in March, Justice Paul Newby ordered the removal of Superior Court Judge David Lee – a move that signaled to many an act of undermining the courts, and skirting the Republican-led General Assembly’s responsibility of properly funding schools.

However, the renewed oral arguments give Leandro plaintiffs a chance to hold Republican legislators accountable by reinstating Lee’s previous order. 

According to a 2004 court ruling in Leandro II, “The court is empowered to order the deficiency remedied and if the offending branch fails to do so…. the court is empowered to provide relief by imposing a specific remedy and instructing the recalcitrant state actors to implement it.”

Essentially, the state Supreme Court could order the legislature to provide enough funding to meet what the court has found to be a state constitutional requirement under the guise of a “sound basic education,” according to The News & Observer.

Currently, with a Democratic majority state Supreme Court, students and public schools could finally receive what they have been owed by state Republican leaders in fully funding education. Yet, if Republicans gain a majority in the state court in November, North Carolina students’ constitutional right may be in limbo.

Read more from the News & Observer

Share:

More Posts

La Guerra Contra DACA: Que le va pasar al programa que protege a los Dreamers?

La administración de Trump aconsejó a los beneficiarios de la Acción Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA) que se auto-deporten y advirtió que no están automáticamente protegidos contra la deportación. Trump prometió llevar a cabo el mayor esfuerzo de deportación masiva en la historia de EE. UU. durante su campaña, y rápidamente tomó medidas para aumentar la aplicación de las leyes migratorias tras su regreso a la Casa Blanca. Sin embargo, ha enviado señales contradictorias sobre DACA.

La mayoría de los adultos en EE. UU. están estresados por el costo de las compras

Aproximadamente la mitad de los estadounidenses afirma que el costo de los comestibles es una fuente de estrés “importante” en sus vidas en este momento, mientras que el 33 % lo considera una fuente de estrés “menor”, según el sondeo del Centro de Investigación NORC‑AP (The Associated Press‑NORC Center for Public Affairs Research). Solo el 14 % declara que no es una fuente de estrés, lo que subraya la ansiedad generalizada que la mayoría de los estadounidenses continúa sintiendo por el costo de los productos de consumo diario.