EPA Finalizing Rule To Officially Designate PFAS As Hazardous Substances

Source: National Law Journal

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a rule that will designate two per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) chemicals as hazardous substances, making polluters financially liable for cleaning up contamination.

PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals,” are a group of man-made chemicals found in many everyday products, including cleaning products, water-resistant fabrics, and non-stick cookware. The EPA has linked PFAS exposure to various health problems, including cancer, immune system issues, and birth defects.

Eleven public water systems in North Carolina have detected levels of the toxic compound PFAS above the EPA’s proposed maximum contaminant level of 4 parts per trillion (ppt). Communities in Eastern North Carolina have been heavily impacted by the contamination as  the manufacturing company Chemours is one of the main sources of these compounds. The company’s Fayetteville Works Plant, on the Cumberland-Bladen county line, discharged PFOS, GenX and other types of PFAS into the Cape Fear River.

The new rule, expected to be finalized next month, will require polluters to cover the costs of cleaning up PFAS contamination under the Superfund law (CERCLA). This could have significant implications for various industries that use PFAS in their products or manufacturing processes.

Safe drinking water is essential for human health. This regulation from the EPA  is crucial for public trust that enables people to use their water without fear of adverse health effects.

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.