Abortion, Voting Rights Groups Invest In North Carolina Supreme Court Race

Source: New York Times

The National Democratic Redistricting Committee, a group that fights for fair legislative maps, and Planned Parenthood Votes, the health care organization’s political arm, are teaming up to invest in state supreme court races in North Carolina as well as Arizona, Michigan, Montana, Ohio, and Texas. The groups plan to spend $5 million across the states to fund digital ads, canvassing operations, and get-out-the-vote efforts, they announced earlier this month.

“Our aim is to protect the independence of state supreme courts, to ensure that they are composed of justices who are dedicated to interpreting the law in a neutral way, who will adhere to precedent and who will protect the fundamental rights of all citizens,” former Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. said in a statement announcing the joint venture.

Judicial elections in North Carolina were officially nonpartisan for much of this century, but after Republicans suffered election losses in 2016, Republican legislators passed a bill to switch judicial elections to partisan

The move helped Republicans take control of the Supreme Court in 2022, after which, in a blatant rejection of legal precedent, they promptly issued new rulings on decisions made mere months earlier when Democrats were in the majority. 

Now, after two U.S. Supreme Court cases have left states in charge of both redistricting and abortion rights, North Carolina’s Supreme Court race this fall, between incumbent Democrat Allison Riggs and Republican challenger Jefferson Griffin, is in the spotlight. 

In one particularly enlightening case for how Griffin, a North Carolina Court of Appeals judge, may rule while on the Supreme Court, Griffin concurred with an opinion that would have established the legal precedent of life beginning at conception in North Carolina, a position that would effectively prohibit all abortions as well as many forms of birth control and fertility treatments.

Alexis McGill Johnson, president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, underscored what’s at stake this fall. “We are in the fight of our lives to protect and restore our fundamental freedoms,” she said in a statement. “And our courts are the front lines.”

Share:

More Posts

La Guerra Contra DACA: Que le va pasar al programa que protege a los Dreamers?

La administración de Trump aconsejó a los beneficiarios de la Acción Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA) que se auto-deporten y advirtió que no están automáticamente protegidos contra la deportación. Trump prometió llevar a cabo el mayor esfuerzo de deportación masiva en la historia de EE. UU. durante su campaña, y rápidamente tomó medidas para aumentar la aplicación de las leyes migratorias tras su regreso a la Casa Blanca. Sin embargo, ha enviado señales contradictorias sobre DACA.

La mayoría de los adultos en EE. UU. están estresados por el costo de las compras

Aproximadamente la mitad de los estadounidenses afirma que el costo de los comestibles es una fuente de estrés “importante” en sus vidas en este momento, mientras que el 33 % lo considera una fuente de estrés “menor”, según el sondeo del Centro de Investigación NORC‑AP (The Associated Press‑NORC Center for Public Affairs Research). Solo el 14 % declara que no es una fuente de estrés, lo que subraya la ansiedad generalizada que la mayoría de los estadounidenses continúa sintiendo por el costo de los productos de consumo diario.