ACLU of North Carolina Files Federal Lawsuit Against State’s Vague, Racist New ‘Anti-Rioting’ Law

Source: WRAL, ACLU of North Carolina

A federal lawsuit just filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina (ACLU-NC) claims that North Carolina’s new anti-rioting law is unconstitutional.

House Bill 40, titled “Prevent Rioting and Civil Disorder,” increases criminal penalties for property damage during a protest and also allows police to charge protesters with a felony if they speak at a rally that later turns violent  – even if they take no part in any of the violence or property destruction.

The ACLU-NC’s lawsuit targets several parts of the law and points out that previous rulings by other courts have found similar rules to be unconstitutional.

“North Carolinians could be arrested and prosecuted under the act even if their own actions were entirely peaceful,” the group’s lawsuit states.

The legislation was right-wing Republicans’ response to the Black Lives Matter protests in North Carolina and across the world that followed the murder of George Floyd in the summer of 2020.

Protesters in Raleigh marched daily throughout the summer, with two of those protests leading to property destruction and heavy-handed responses from Raleigh police and the Wake County Sheriff’s Office.

Republicans wrote the legislation in intentionally vague terms because the true goal of it is to prevent people from protesting at all in the first place. Additionally, we have seen in the past that vague laws are discriminatory laws – when laws are left up for interpretation it often results in Black and brown communities feeling its impacts the hardest.

According to the ACLU-NC’s lawsuit, the vague language in the law will allow police to arrest nearly anyone they want to during protests. One of the most frightening aspects of this new law is that anyone arrested at a protest will be required to spend at least 24 hours in jail before they will have the possibility to bond out.

“This bill forces North Carolinians to risk the immediate and long-term loss of their freedom when exercising their right to protest,” the ACLU-NC said in a press release. “This suit is an effort to protect the right to protest and advances our continued support and defense of the Black Lives Matter movement and activists.”

House Bill 40 won’t stop any potential violence or rioting, but instead will only serve to stifle constitutionally guaranteed free speech and criminalize protest. This legislation was just one part of a larger Republican agenda of gaining power, silencing dissent and taking away North Carolinians’ freedoms.

What might make this law even worse is that House Speaker Tim Moore pushed for its passage with exaggerations and lies. He couldn’t even be honest with the people of North Carolina.

While appearing on the “Tying it Together with Tim Boyum” podcast, which was recorded at the legislature on Feb. 7, Moore claimed he supports people’s right to protest and said, “What we do have to rein in, though, is when it becomes violent, and when it becomes destructive. We saw the riots that happened just blocks from this building a few years ago.”

Instead of sticking to the facts, Moore continued, saying that “people were injured” at the protests and “I think someone was actually shot and killed, where there was significant property damage.”

According to WRAL, Moore made similar comments in legislative meetings the next day, on Feb. 8. He told the House Rules Committee that the 2020 protests in downtown Raleigh included “those who want to engage in violence, engage in destruction of property, and turn it into that. People — one man — was actually killed. You had folks who were severely injured. I saw some of this myself.”

In a legislative Judiciary Committee meeting, Moore claimed to have seen the supposed violence “up close and personal,” adding that “We saw people die. We saw folks get seriously injured.”

Raleigh police confirmed that Moore’s reports were false – they noted several incidents of property damage, and some looting and burglary, but no serious physical violence or deaths.

The bill passed both chambers of the legislature and became law in March.

Share:

More Posts

Trump administration’s move to shut down USAID will have major economic impacts on North Carolina

The move will impact more than just the 10,000 workers the agency employs and the humanitarian work it does overseas. North Carolina is the fourth-largest recipient of USAID funding in the United States, with state-based organizations receiving nearly $1 billion a year. That funding helps bolster a robust global health sector that adds $31.9 billion every year to North Carolina’s economy and employs 120,000 people.

To have their voices heard, thousands gather throughout NC to protest Trump, Musk, and Tillis

Earlier this month, thousands of demonstrators gathered at the North Carolina State Capitol in Raleigh to protest President Donald Trump. The protest was part of a larger event “50 states 50 protest 1 day” (50501) to oppose the president’s actions taken in the first month of his second term including a slew of executive orders that have caused chaos and confusion for the people of this country and the federal agencies that support them.

El Pueblo Lanza una Guía de Emergencia en Español para Inmigrantes Latinos

El Pueblo, una organización de derechos de los inmigrantes latinos con sede en Carolina del Norte, lanzó una guía de emergencia en español titulada “Familias Seguras. Guía de Emergencia para Inmigrantes”. La guía tiene el objetivo de informar a las familias inmigrantes latinas sobre sus derechos y prepararlas para posibles interacciones con las autoridades migratorias y de la ley, citando las preocupaciones sobre el aumento de las operaciones del Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés) durante la administración de Trump.

NC Republicans Push to Strip Power from Democratic Leaders—Again

This time, the NC GOP is targeting Attorney General Jeff Jackson, who has recently defended the state from the White House’s federal funding freeze, Elon Musk’s national data breach, and Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship. 

Senate Bill 58, proposed earlier this month, would prohibit the attorney general from making any legal argument that would invalidate an executive order issued by Trump.