Legal Victory for Same-Sex Couples 

North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in favor of allowing victims of domestic violence in same-sex relationships to obtain restraining orders. This victory for the LGBTQ community is a result of a 4-year litigation battle, starting in Wake County. 

The plaintiff, known only as “M.E.”, appealed after a Wake County district court ruled she was ineligible for a domestic violence protection order because the couple had never been married and were in a same-sex relationship. The ruling will nullify a law that stated only same-sex couples could seek domestic violence protection orders if they’re married or divorced. North Carolina is the last state in the nation to extend protections to same-sex relationships. 

Conservative Justice Phil Berger Jr. authored the dissent, joined by Justice Tamara Barringer and Chief Justice Paul Newby. Democratic Attorney General Josh Stein, submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in the case. On Twitter, Stein called the decision “an important win for equality” in North Carolina. “It doesn’t matter who you are — every person in NC deserves to be treated equally under the law & be safe from their abusers,” the Attorney General wrote. 

“She has courageously and tirelessly fought for almost 4 years to ensure not only that she has the protection she deserves, but that all victims in same-sex dating relationships in N.C. do as well,” said the plaintiffs attorney, Aimy McCool.

Share:

More Posts

La Corte Suprema de EE.UU. debilita la Ley de Derechos Electorales: qué significa y qué podría pasar ahora

Una reciente decisión de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos podría transformar el panorama político del país y reabrir una intensa batalla sobre cómo se trazan los distritos electorales. El fallo, emitido en el caso Louisiana v. Callais, limita de manera significativa el alcance de la histórica Ley de Derechos Electorales de 1965 y podría facilitar que varios estados rediseñen sus mapas electorales antes de las próximas elecciones.