‘Mommy, why are they telling me to cut my hair?’

Source: Editorial Board

Over the past two weeks in Eastern North Carolina, the parents of Edward Chavis, and Logan Lomboy have been fighting to protect their son’s long hair from being cut. Edward, a 7-year-old member of the Lumbee Tribe, and Logan, a 6-year-old member of the Waccamaw Siouan Tribe of North Carolina, are both very active in their culture and spiritual traditions and are proud of their heritage.

Both boys are first graders attending one of the four Classical Charter Schools of America. Classical Charter Schools of America was founded in 1999 with a single school in Leland. Since then, they have expanded to three other schools in Southport, Whiteville and Wilmington, which in total serve more than 2,500 students.

Before February of this year, Edward and Logan had not received any complaints from school officials regarding their long hair, which they both kept in a bun or a long braid. Yet, now both students are being told to cut their hair to be compliant with the charter school’s Parent-Student Handbook

On p. 34 of the handbook, it states:

Boys: Grooming Standards

  • Hair must be neatly trimmed and off the collar, above the eyebrows, not below the top of the ears or eyebrows, and not at an excessive height.
  • Distracting, extreme, radical, or faddish haircuts, hairstyles, and colors are not allowed.
  • No mustaches or beards. Boys must be clean-shaven.

Logan’s mom, Ashley Lomboy was outraged when she was notified by the Classical Charter headmaster and lead administrator that her son needed to cut his hair because it was “faddish”. In her op-ed posted on the ACLU website, she comes to the defense of her son and other Native American students. She writes:

“The definition of faddish according to Webster’s dictionary is “intensely fashionable for a short time.” Native Americans have been wearing their hair long — whether it is for ceremony, in preparation for protecting our tribe, or as part of our tradition — since time immemorial. For more than 1,000 years, the Waccamaw Siouan tribe has and continues to steward the land that the school currently occupies, as well as all the surrounding land of the Cape Fear Region. This is the very definition of long-term and the opposite of a “fad.” For Native American boys and men, wearing their hair long is traditional.”

Both Logan’s and Edwards’ parents have filed grievances with the charter school regarding the policy and have both been denied with no explanation.

Luckily, these families are not fighting alone. They have much support from the American Civil Liberties Union, which has sent a letter to the school, an overwhelming amount of support from their communities, and both the Waccamaw Siouan and Lumbee tribes have signed resolutions supporting the boys. 

So why is this important? Why should we be protecting the rights of these two Native American boys to wear their long hair?

It is actually a bigger issue than that. 

Unfortunately, Edward and Logan are not the only children being targeted by their schools in North Carolina to cut or change the style of their hair. Most often, the parents of other targeted children decide to comply with the school policies or remove their children from the school. 

What can be done to prevent this from happening moving forward?

Let’s be honest, public schools and charter schools across our state will continue to create school policies that are meant to help students “focus more on their studies” but are quite problematic. It is not fair or equitable to ask a student to change their natural hair texture, cut their hair, or style their hair so they can assimilate into the dominant (white) culture. This strips away their humanity and their culture.

This is why the Crown Act needs to be made law in North Carolina. The Crown Act is a law that will prohibit discrimination based on hair style and texture. Also, it will ban companies from denying employment or firing someone because of their natural hair. 

Right now, the Crown Act is in the North Carolina Senate. Hopefully, it will make some movement into law this session. But who knows?

Thankfully for both Edward and Logan, they will be able to complete this school year without needing to cut their hair. However, after the Board of Trustees of Classical Charter schools makes a decision on this policy for the 2023-2024 school year, these two kids along with others may have to find another school so they don’t have to change their hair.

Our children deserve the right to wear their natural hair. No person (child or adult) should be asked to change their hair to comply with white racial standards.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.