NC Chief Justice Won’t Say Why He’s Removing Judges From Leadership Positions

Source: Charlotte Observer

North Carolina Chief Justice Paul Newby won’t explain why he replaced Mecklenburg County’s top district court judge, Elizabeth Trosch. Newby chose to designate District Court Judge Roy Wiggins as chief, removing Trosch from the position she held for four years.

“There won’t be a comment on this from the Judicial Branch,” said the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts. Newby has declined interviews from multiple news outlets. Trosch has also received no explanation, she said, except that Newby wanted to go in a “different direction.”

North Carolina judges are elected, and Trosch remains on the bench though she has lost the leadership position. Both Trosch and Wiggins, the new chief district court judge, are Democrats. Newby is a Republican.

Trosch led the district court during the COVID-19 pandemic and as the state shifted to eCourts, a new online court record system to replace paper. A letter signed by other local judges after the news came out commended her for her “collaborative style,” especially during those moments. “She always involves her colleagues, other court partners and community members in her decision-making process,” the letter said. 

Newby has replaced other judges in leadership positions. Earlier this year, Newby removed Judge Donna Stroud from her position as the chief judge on the North Carolina Court of Appeals and put Judge Chris Dillon in the role. Newby offered no explanation when the Raleigh News & Observer reported that change. A former Court of Appeals judge called it an “unprecedented” move.

“People generally just need two things from us, from the court,” Trosch said of her leadership philosophy. “They need to feel that they were heard, and that the process treated them fairly.”Read more at the Charlotte Observer.

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.