NC Rep. Kathy Manning’s Bill Guaranteeing Access To Contraception Passes; Budd, 7 Other NC Republicans Vote Against

Just a few days after the U.S. House of Representatives voted to codify same-sex and interracial marriage at the federal level, the House passed a bill on Thursday to guarantee access to contraception.

The Right to Contraception Act, which was introduced by Rep. Kathy Manning, a Democrat who represents North Carolina’s 6th Congressional District, was passed by a final vote of 228-195.

Eight Republicans crossed the aisle and voted in favor of the bill along with every Democrat, according to CNN. In comparison, 47 Republicans (although none from North Carolina) voted with Democrats to pass the Respect for Marriage Act earlier in the week.

The move to codify these rights comes in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and the concern that many have regarding other constitutional rights (same-sex marriage, freedom to have consensual sexual relations with a member of the same sex, access to contraceptives, etc.) that could be next on the high court’s chopping block.

Manning’s Right to Contraception Act would guarantee “access to contraceptives and to engage in contraception, and to protect a health care provider’s ability to provide contraceptives, contraception, and information related to contraception,” according to the act’s text. This includes emergency contraceptives such as Plan B.

CNN reported that the White House “strongly supports” Manning’s bill and said that “access to contraception is essential to ensuring all people have control over personal decisions about their own health, lives, and families.”

Manning wrote the bill in order to protect the rights granted by the Supreme Court’s 1965 decision in Griswold v. State of Connecticut, which made it a constitutional right of women and couples to purchase and use birth control without penalty from the state. Some states, including Connecticut, used to ban women and couples from using birth control.

Recent polls show that 90% of all Americans support legal access to birth control and/or condoms in “all” or “most” cases and 81% said the same regarding IUDs.

In an interview with WGHP after her bill passed, Manning told the TV station that she wasn’t shocked by the lack of support from Republicans, saying it was “not the least bit unexpected but disappointing to American women because we know millions of American women use contraceptives.”

Manning went on to say that her bill shouldn’t be a partisan issue because “96% of American women will use contraceptives at some point in their life. That includes women who are Democrats, women who are Republican, women who are independent, and women who have no political affiliation and really don’t pay attention to politics.”

The congresswoman pointed out that, based on their speeches, many of the Republicans who spoke out against her bill didn’t even read it.

“They’re pushing fake science about how contraceptives actually work. The main argument that they are trying to make is that this is about abortion and not contraceptives,” Manning said. “They are conflating abortion with preventing unintended pregnancy. It’s a false equivalence.”

North Carolina Republicans Dan Bishop, Ted Budd, Madison Cawthorn, Virginia Foxx, Richard Hudson, Patrick McHenry, Greg Murphy and David Rouzer all voted against Manning’s bill.

WGHP reached out to the offices of Budd, Foxx and Hudson for comment. The TV station did not receive a response providing an explanation for why the representatives don’t believe that people should have access to contraception.

Budd, the Republican candidate for North Carolina’s open U.S. Senate seat who also voted against the Respect for Marriage Act and a House bill that would restore abortion rights nationwide, has not provided any explanation for any of his recent votes on these highly important reproductive rights issues.

Cheri Beasley, the Democratic candidate for the Senate, sent out tweets criticizing Budd’s vote and praising Manning for her efforts to get the bill passed.

“The House passed the Right to Contraception Act with bipartisan support – and Ted Budd voted against it,” she said. “In the last week, Budd is 0 for 3 in protecting our constitutional freedoms.”

Beasley followed up that tweet with one thanking Manning.

“Thank you to [Kathy Manning] for your leadership on this issue, and for always being a champion for women in Congress,” she wrote.

Beasley also sent a statement to the press hitting Budd for his continuously terrible positions on issues of constitutional freedoms.

“Congressman Budd’s vote against protecting access to contraception is just the latest reminder that he will stop at nothing to strip North Carolinians of our freedoms,” she said in her statement. “Americans have a constitutional right to make decisions about their own bodies and families – without government interference – and the Senate should act swiftly to protect this fundamental freedom.”

Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, both Democrats from Virginia, filed a companion bill in the Senate.

It’s not known at this time when the Senate will hold a vote on the bill or what chances it has of getting passed since it will need 60 votes to clear the filibuster threshold.

Share:

More Posts

Nuevos planes presupuestarios de los republicanos en el Congreso proponen recortes fiscales drásticos para los estadounidenses más ricos

Los nuevos planes presupuestarios propuestos por los republicanos en el Congreso incluyen recortes fiscales significativos para los estadounidenses más ricos. En particular, buscan extender las disposiciones sobre el impuesto sobre la renta individual y el impuesto sobre el patrimonio de la Ley de Recortes de Impuestos y Empleos de 2017. Según el Departamento del Tesoro de EE.UU., estos recortes costarían cerca de 4,2 billones de dólares en la próxima década, con casi el 60 por ciento de esos recortes beneficiando al 10 por ciento más rico de los contribuyentes, quienes ganan más de 228,060 dólares anuales. Mientras tanto, el 1 por ciento más rico de los ingresos vería una reducción fiscal de más de 1,24 billones de dólares, representando aproximadamente el 30 por ciento del total de los recortes fiscales.
Los planes también proponen recortar programas vitales para la clase trabajadora de Estados Unidos. Entre los recortes más grandes se encuentran Medicaid, que aseguraría una reducción de 880 mil millones de dólares, afectando a 72 millones de personas, y el Programa de Asistencia Nutricional Suplementaria, con un recorte de 230 mil millones de dólares que afectaría a 42 millones de personas. Estos recortes expulsarían a millones de estadounidenses de estos programas esenciales, dejando a los más vulnerables sin apoyo. Los recortes a Medicaid y el programa de nutrición podrían ser equivalentes al total de los recortes fiscales para el 1 por ciento más rico.
Además, los republicanos planean reducir políticas fiscales que benefician a la clase trabajadora. Esto incluye detener el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía limpia y eficiencia energética, que ayudaron a millones de familias a ahorrar en facturas de energía. Derogar estas inversiones podría aumentar el precio de la electricidad en un 10 por ciento y la gasolina en más de 20 centavos por galón. También se están considerando recortes en créditos fiscales para las familias trabajadoras, como la eliminación del crédito por cuidado de niños y dependientes, la reducción del límite de deducción por intereses hipotecarios, y la eliminación de créditos fiscales para gastos educativos.
Además de los recortes fiscales y programas, los republicanos del Congreso están dispuestos a aumentar la deuda nacional en 2,8 billones de dólares debido a los recortes fiscales para los más ricos. Esto generaría un aumento en los déficits y los costos de endeudamiento, lo que a su vez afectaría a los consumidores con tasas de interés más altas en préstamos, como hipotecas y créditos. Los estadounidenses ya enfrentan el costo de la vida, por lo que recortar programas esenciales y otorgar billones en recortes fiscales para los más ricos es injusto e impopular. Esta estrategia no solo perjudica a la clase trabajadora, sino que también beneficia a quienes están mejor posicionados para afrontar los gastos de su día a día, aumentando aún más la desigualdad económica en el país.

Republicans push forward bills to ban cellphones in classes, reduce power of attorney general, and require ICE agreements

The North Carolina General Assembly has seen a number of bills being introduced ranging from education policy to governmental powers. This week, North Carolina Republican Senators in the Rules Committee moved along legislation that: prohibits phones from being on during classroom instruction, requires state officials to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and restricts the state’s Attorney General from taking legal action against the executive orders of President Donald Trump.

Despite public concerns, NC Republicans look to bring Musk’s DOGE to state government

Taking a cue from President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, Republican state lawmakers in North Carolina are beginning to probe state agencies. 

Republicans have been in full control of state government spending in North Carolina for the last 14 years. However, the allegations of fraud and waste made by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have grabbed the attention of conservative politicians.