Supreme Court Decision on Alabama Voting Maps Could Shake Up North Carolina

Source: The News & Observer

The Supreme Court decision on Alabama redistricting may breathe new life into states like North Carolina, which is facing anti-voter measures by Republicans, a gerrymandering case and an upcoming round of redistricting. 

In a 5-4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court found that Alabama’s Republican-controlled legislature-drawn congressional map violated Black voters’ rights, which are protected under the Voting Rights Act.

Alabama Republican lawmakers drew a single majority-Black congressional district – out of seven statewide seats – after the 2020 census, essentially diluting Black voting power. 

According to Vox, the court’s ruling will lead to the creation of an additional majority-Black congressional district in Alabama; eliminating a Republican-held seat and possibly giving Democrats an additional seat in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a majority. 

The Alabama ruling offers hope to North Carolina, which will draw new voting maps in the coming weeks. According to The News & Observer, the Alabama decision may limit how much North Carolina’s Republican lawmakers can dilute Black voting power when they draw new districts for the 2024 election.

“Today’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court is a victory for American democracy and voters everywhere,” stated Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause North Carolina. “This decision should serve as a clear warning to North Carolina politicians that racist gerrymandering and attacks on voting rights will not stand.”

Currently, North Carolina faces a Republican-controlled legislature and state Supreme Court, which agreed to re-decide cases on voter ID, voting rights for people with felonies, and redistricting, despite rulings made months ago by the then Democratic-controlled state Supreme Court. 

State Republicans are also pushing forth a bill that would eliminate the three-day grace period for acceptance of mail-in ballots postmarked on or before Election Day and limit those who register and vote on the same day to cast only a provisional ballot.

“North Carolina politicians should take note of today’s ruling and reject attempts to undermine voting rights,” Phillips stated. “We must protect everyone’s freedom to vote.”

Read more at The News & Observer

Share:

More Posts

NC House Democrats Stand United Against SB 153

SB 153 is a right-wing bill that would burden local law enforcement, infringe on the rights of local governments, and further empower ICE to perform unconstitutional raids on North Carolina communities. 

Redadas de ICE en Charlotte y Concord: Intensificación de Arrestos de Inmigrantes en Carolina del Norte

En una reunión celebrada el 21 de mayo en la sede de ICE en Washington, el principal asesor del presidente Trump, Stephen Miller, y la secretaría de Seguridad Nacional, Kristi Noem, instruyeron a los oficiales de inmigración a aumentar los arrestos diarios a 3,000, triplicando la cifra alcanzada en los primeros meses del mandato de Trump. Este objetivo forma parte de un esfuerzo por ejecutar la operación de deportación más grande en la historia de Estados Unidos. 

Trump’s FEMA Denies North Carolina’s Hurricane Helene Aid Request, Again

“FEMA’s denial of our appeal will cost North Carolina taxpayers potentially hundreds of millions of dollars to clean up out west,” Stein explained. “The money we have to pay toward debris removal will mean less money toward supporting our small businesses, rebuilding downtown infrastructure, repairing our water and sewer systems, and other critical needs.”

3 Million People Could Lose SNAP Under GOP Plan, Gov. Stein Warns of NC Fallout

“If Congress goes forward with these plans, our state will be forced into perilous budget decisions – should North Carolinians lose access to food, or should we get rid of other essential services?” Gov. Stein wrote. “I urge our members of Congress to reject this budget proposal so that North Carolina families don’t go hungry.”