Supreme Court Decision on Alabama Voting Maps Could Shake Up North Carolina

Source: The News & Observer

The Supreme Court decision on Alabama redistricting may breathe new life into states like North Carolina, which is facing anti-voter measures by Republicans, a gerrymandering case and an upcoming round of redistricting. 

In a 5-4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court found that Alabama’s Republican-controlled legislature-drawn congressional map violated Black voters’ rights, which are protected under the Voting Rights Act.

Alabama Republican lawmakers drew a single majority-Black congressional district – out of seven statewide seats – after the 2020 census, essentially diluting Black voting power. 

According to Vox, the court’s ruling will lead to the creation of an additional majority-Black congressional district in Alabama; eliminating a Republican-held seat and possibly giving Democrats an additional seat in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a majority. 

The Alabama ruling offers hope to North Carolina, which will draw new voting maps in the coming weeks. According to The News & Observer, the Alabama decision may limit how much North Carolina’s Republican lawmakers can dilute Black voting power when they draw new districts for the 2024 election.

“Today’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court is a victory for American democracy and voters everywhere,” stated Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause North Carolina. “This decision should serve as a clear warning to North Carolina politicians that racist gerrymandering and attacks on voting rights will not stand.”

Currently, North Carolina faces a Republican-controlled legislature and state Supreme Court, which agreed to re-decide cases on voter ID, voting rights for people with felonies, and redistricting, despite rulings made months ago by the then Democratic-controlled state Supreme Court. 

State Republicans are also pushing forth a bill that would eliminate the three-day grace period for acceptance of mail-in ballots postmarked on or before Election Day and limit those who register and vote on the same day to cast only a provisional ballot.

“North Carolina politicians should take note of today’s ruling and reject attempts to undermine voting rights,” Phillips stated. “We must protect everyone’s freedom to vote.”

Read more at The News & Observer

Share:

More Posts

A victory for North Carolina Voters: Jefferson Griffin finally concedes in state Supreme Court race

Griffin’s concession comes after a federal judge ordered North Carolina election officials to confirm the victory of Justice Allison Riggs on the state Supreme Court. U.S. District Judge Richard Myers, appointed to the bench by Trump, ruled that all of the ballots challenged by Judge Jefferson Griffin must count and ordered the State Board of Elections to certify the results that Allison Riggs won.

Money talks: chemical giant, Chemours donates thousands to NC GOP lawmakers

Now the company is looking to lawmakers to avoid having to face more consequences for their pollution of North Carolina waters.  This legislative session, lawmakers are considering bills to hold polluters accountable, including House Bill 569, entitled “PFAS Pollution and Polluter Liability” and Senate Bill 666, the “2025 Water Safety Act”.