You Likely Missed Your Chance to Give Feedback on NC’s New Voting Maps – and That’s Exactly What the NCGOP Wants

Source: Editorial Board

Public hearings on redistricting came and went in the span of three days in three different parts of the state during the last week of September. If you blinked, you missed it – and that’s the way Republican lawmakers like it.

Hundreds of North Carolina voters showed up in Elizabeth City, Hickory and Raleigh to tell Republicans they should be ashamed for what everyone knows they’re about to do to the state’s congressional and legislative voting maps.

North Carolina’s current congressional map is a good example of a fair map – it splits the state into 14 districts with seven favoring Democrats and seven favoring Republicans. Unsurprisingly, this map was court-ordered, but it can only be used for one cycle, which it has been. When Republicans are done redrawing the map later this month, we could, for example, end up with districts that will send 10 Republicans and just four Democrats to Washington.

Unfortunately, due to a new public records provision put in the budget bill, Republicans have changed who gets to oversee their public documents and legislators may not be required to respond to any public records requests regarding new maps. That means that the public will literally have no idea how Republicans came up with the new maps and Republicans won’t be required to ever tell the public if they don’t want to.

Lawmakers have been working on new maps for weeks, and despite holding those public hearings in September, voters have not seen what NCGOP legislators have been drawing up behind closed doors. Republicans held public hearings on redistricting and received plenty of informative responses from voters, but they held those hearings without providing any new maps or drafts of maps. Once they do release the new districts, the public won’t be allowed to give any feedback to lawmakers because no new hearings will be held.

Lawmakers could start voting on redistricting in another week or two and the odds are quite high that they will take none of the feedback they received from voters into consideration while working on the maps. 

Republicans know that they can get away with it because they have made it legal to hide the process from the public and they know the state Supreme Court will allow them to divide up the maps however they want to, thus avoiding any potential electoral repercussions as a result of their disdain for democracy.

Share:

More Posts

Otro año pasa con la demanda Leandro sobre el financiamiento escolar estancada

La Corte Suprema de Carolina del Norte continúa sin emitir un fallo en la histórica demandaLeandro sobre el financiamiento de las escuelas públicas, dejando el caso en el limbo más de 660 días después de que se escucharan los alegatos orales. La demora es inusual y se produce pese a que el tribunal ya publicó sus decisiones finales del año sin incluir este caso clave, que podría definir el futuro de la educación pública en el estado.

Trump vuelve a vender cheques de $2,000 sin plan, sin aval legal y sin garantías

Donald Trump ha retomado la promesa de enviar cheques de reembolso de hasta $2,000 a los estadounidenses en 2026, asegurando que los fondos provendrían de los ingresos generados por los aranceles. Sin embargo, la propuesta carece de un plan concreto y enfrenta importantes obstáculos legales y políticos que ponen en duda su viabilidad.

My ACA premium is increasing 240%

My husband and I are small business owners, so we rely on the Affordable Care Act for health care coverage. We currently pay $400 per month for medical and dental care. But, because of Republicans’ refusal to fix the crisis they’ve created, our monthly medical health premium is expected to cost us 240% more in 2026. And my daughter, a Medicaid recipient, could lose coverage altogether.

Autoridades federales comparten datos de viajeros con ICE, incluso en vuelos nacionales

La Administración de Seguridad en el Transporte (Transportation Security Administration, TSA) está proporcionando a las autoridades migratorias de Estados Unidos listas con los nombres de personas que se espera viajen a través de aeropuertos del país, como parte del programa de deportaciones de la administración del presidente Donald Trump, según informó The New York Times.