Leandro Case Arguments Scheduled for August

Source: WRAL

The North Carolina Supreme Court will hear arguments in August on the long-running Leandro school funding case.

Beginning the week of Aug. 29, parties in the case will be able to challenge a lower court’s order by Superior Special Court Judge Michael Robinson that ruled the state owed the $785 million of the proposed Comprehensive Remedial Plan. The Republican judge’s designated amount is a significant reduction of what lawmakers needed to meet in order to fully fund the state’s education from a previous judicial order.

The original cost, which the state could readily cover the first two years, was put aside in favor of a price tag that was more appealing to state Republicans.

Robinson’s ruling also failed to specify how the funds should be transferred – leaving that open for the state Supreme Court.

Last fall, Superior Court Judge David Lee, who was removed from overseeing the case in favor of a Republican judge, ordered legislators to resolve the state’s decades-long failure to meet its constitutional obligation in providing children with the opportunity to obtain a sound, basic education.

Despite the demands, Republicans dragged their feet on the opportunity to fully fund public schools, increase educators’ pay to decent living wages, expanded pre-kindergarten and early childhood education and tackle crumbling school infrastructures, among many other things.

Read more from the News & Observer

Share:

More Posts

NC Senate Democrats Demand Action For Western North Carolina

Minority leader Sydney Batch argued that the people of western NC cannot afford to wait. “Senator Berger wants the legislature to recess for two months while hurricane survivors are still living in uninhabitable homes, facing washed-out roads and waiting for their classrooms to reopen,” Batch said.  “He may be ready for a vacation, but our neighbors in western North Carolina don’t get to take a break from this crisis.”

 North Carolina Redistricting Trial Begins Amid Racial Gerrymandering Claims

The lawsuits claim that lines are so skewed for GOP candidates that many Black voters cannot elect their preferred candidates, violating the Voting Rights Act. They allege the mapmakers at times submerged or spread out Black voting blocs, which historically have favored Democrats, into surrounding districts with White majorities — benefiting Republicans.