NC Legislative Sessions Have Become Longer, Preventing Younger And More Diverse Candidates From Running

Over the past decade, North Carolina’s part-time legislature’s sessions have become longer and longer, with this year’s 199 day session claiming the record for longest. The salary for this 199 day long session remained the standard – just under $14,000.  It has remained stagnant for 28 years. 

This may explain why our North Carolina lawmakers tend to be independently wealthy, business owners, retirees, or all of the above; they’re the only people who can afford to take a year off. 

Charlotte City Councilman Malcolm Graham, who previously served as Democratic State Senator representing Mecklenburg County for 10 years, retired in 2016, saying that it had turned into a full time job with a completely unpredictable schedule. 

Graham is not independently wealthy, nor is he a business owner. He worked for a private university that gave him the luxury of running and serving in public office, however, they understandably still expected him to be able to come to work. Unfortunately, as we’ve seen, the ‘part-time’ part of this job description may have been used a little too loosely. 

Michael Bitzer, a Catawba College political science professor, says the income limitation on representation is a problem; “That skews, not just the legislature’s perspective, but what issues get addressed as well, from a policymaking point of view”. Bitzer says higher pay would attract more diverse candidates. 

On the subject of salary, House Speaker Tim Moore was quick to shoot down the suggestion of an increase, saying it would be “politically unpopular”.  “As long as I’m Speaker, we’re not going to give a pay raise,” he said. “Anybody who signs up to do this job for the money is in for a rude awakening, right? I mean, it does cost money for those of us who are here. … It really requires sacrifice.”

Share:

More Posts

 La Corte de Apelaciones Federal Mantiene el Bloqueo al Uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por Parte de Trump para Deportar Inmigrantes

Una corte de apelaciones federal ha rechazado la solicitud de la administración Trump para levantar una orden de restricción temporal (TRO) que bloquea el uso de la Ley de Enemigos Extranjeros por parte de la administración Trump para deportar a inmigrantes. La decisión de 2-1 proviene de una demanda presentada por la Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles (ACLU), Democracy Forward y la ACLU del Distrito de Columbia.

¡Únete a la Lucha por los Derechos de los Pacientes con Planned Parenthood!

El miércoles 2 de abril, la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos escuchará los argumentos orales en el caso Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, un caso de Carolina del Sur que decidirá si el gobierno puede impedir que las personas que usan Medicaid accedan a los servicios de Planned Parenthood, como anticonceptivos, exámenes de cáncer y otros servicios rutinarios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Este caso pone en riesgo el acceso a la atención médica para millones de personas que han confiado en Planned Parenthood para servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva.