Future Rights On The Line In Judicial Elections In NC, Four Other States

Source: Huffington Post

A recent HuffPost article highlighted judicial races in five states where the outcomes will determine the future of key rights ranging from abortion to voting.

The article looks at contests in North Carolina, Illinois, Michigan, Montana and Ohio. According to HuffPost, in each of these five states, “one political party or ideological bloc holds a one-vote majority on the most pressing issues, including abortion and redistricting.”

North Carolina has two vitally important races for Supreme Court seats on the ballot this year and they will most likely determine the future of reproductive rights, voting rights, public education and more in our state.

Democrats currently hold a 4-3 majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court but Republicans could find themselves with a 5-2 advantage after November’s election if they win both seats.

Democratic Associate Justice Robin Hudson’s term ends at the end of this year and she is not running for reelection. In the race to replace her, North Carolina Court of Appeals Judge Lucy Inman, a Democrat, is taking on Republican Judge Richard Dietz, who serves alongside Inman on the court.

The other seat up for grabs is that of incumbent Democratic Supreme Court Associate Justice Sam Ervin IV. Ervin is running for reelection and he’s facing Republican Trey Allen, the general counsel for the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts.

A WRAL poll from early October shows Dietz and Allen leading their Democratic opponents, but the races have tightened significantly from where polling was in the summer.

HuffPost’s piece looks at abortion rights, voting rights, gerrymandered district maps and the fate of legislative redistricting in North Carolina. Our state is unfortunately unique in all of the potential harm that could be in our future if Republicans take control of the state Supreme Court and get supermajorities in the General Assembly.

Abortion bans in 10 states, including Michigan, Montana and Ohio, are currently blocked by state court orders as they review the constitutionality of the bans. North Carolina could potentially ban abortion next year if Republicans get control of the court and legislature.

Realizing just how important these judicial races are, organizations including the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC), National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), Planned Parenthood and the ACLU are all putting money into the contests in North Carolina.

Planned Parenthood Action Fund’s national campaign director Sarah Standiford explained to HuffPost her organization’s decision to invest in these races.

“We’re super clear that the path to restore, protect and expand abortion access and ultimately abortion equity runs through the states,” she said. “And I think that’s now more clear to voters than ever before.”

Let’s hope that Standiford is right and voters in North Carolina and throughout the United States elect candidates who will stand up for reproductive rights, voting rights, fair elections, LGBTQ+ rights and more.

Share:

More Posts

La Guerra Contra DACA: Que le va pasar al programa que protege a los Dreamers?

La administración de Trump aconsejó a los beneficiarios de la Acción Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA) que se auto-deporten y advirtió que no están automáticamente protegidos contra la deportación. Trump prometió llevar a cabo el mayor esfuerzo de deportación masiva en la historia de EE. UU. durante su campaña, y rápidamente tomó medidas para aumentar la aplicación de las leyes migratorias tras su regreso a la Casa Blanca. Sin embargo, ha enviado señales contradictorias sobre DACA.

La mayoría de los adultos en EE. UU. están estresados por el costo de las compras

Aproximadamente la mitad de los estadounidenses afirma que el costo de los comestibles es una fuente de estrés “importante” en sus vidas en este momento, mientras que el 33 % lo considera una fuente de estrés “menor”, según el sondeo del Centro de Investigación NORC‑AP (The Associated Press‑NORC Center for Public Affairs Research). Solo el 14 % declara que no es una fuente de estrés, lo que subraya la ansiedad generalizada que la mayoría de los estadounidenses continúa sintiendo por el costo de los productos de consumo diario.